News and analysis from The Center for Michigan • http://thecenterformichigan.net
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at http://bridgemi.com

Original article URL: http://bridgemi.com/2011/11/michigan-reaches-for-upper-rungs-on-tourism/

Economy & competitive position/Public sector

Michigan reaches for upper rungs on tourism

Five years of Pure Michigan national advertising is just beginning to buff up the state’s rust-belt image.

After the state had spent $67 million for the slick campaign featuring the voice of Michigan native Tim Allen, a survey done for the state found that Michigan still ranked in the middle of the pack in tourism interest among seven Great Lakes states.

This survey — conducted by Longwoods International, a firm that provides tourism analysis, including to the state of Michigan — found Michigan still suffering from a perception problem. Only 36 percent of the approximately 6,000 respondents said they “strongly agreed” they would “really enjoy visiting” the state. That placed Michigan in a tie for fourth in interest among seven Great Lakes states.

“Michigan is starting with an image from a much lower baseline than its competitors,” said Bill Siegel, a University of Michigan alum who heads Longwoods.

Still, Siegel argues that his firm’s research shows “the advertising works.”

In 2009, Michigan captured 2 percent of all the tourism spending in the United States, placing Michigan 14th nationwide for such spending.

Tourism dollars dipped in 2009, but rebounded in 2010, reaching $17 billion, according to state officials.

Such results, even amid a sputtering national economy and an industry-wide dip, are credited by observers inside and outside Michigan to the state’s Pure Michigan advertising campaign.

“I think the Pure Michigan campaign has to rank among the most well-crafted and appropriate destination campaigns in the United States,” said Peter Yesawich, chairman and CEO of Ypartnership, a Florida advertising, marketing and promotions company.

The ad campaign constitutes the vast majority of spending done by Travel Michigan, the state’s tourism office. For the 2010-11 fiscal year, that spending placed Michigan No. 7 overall among state tourism offices and No. 3 on marketing/advertising spending.

How does that compare to what other states are doing?

Tricky question, replies University of Michigan alum Bill Siegel.

Siegel explains that it is difficult to do an apples-to-apples comparison of Pure Michigan to other campaigns:

“The reason why the (return on investment) numbers are lower (in Michigan) than a lot of other states is a more conservative measure was applied at the direction of (Travel Michigan head) George Zimmermann,” Siegel said. “It allows him to say 100 percent of the leisure travel dollars cited were spent by non-residents of Michigan. From that point of view, there is nothing wrong with this approach, but when other states include in-state tourism, it makes a comparison difficult.”

Funding decisions among the states have varied widely, with some following Michigan in notably increasing public spending this year, while others retrenched.

In a move that draw national attention, the state of Washington earlier this year zeroed out its public tourism budget. Other states that made significant cuts between 2009-10 and 2010-11 include: Arizona (41 percent); Illinois (31 percent); Missouri (26 percent); and New York (31 percent).

Beyond Michigan (47 percent), states that invested heavily include: Louisiana (101 percent); Alaska (53 percent); Hawaii (16 percent); Kansas (48 percent); and California (17 percent).

Michigan increased its public tourism budget from $18.675 million in 2009-10 to $27.44 million in 2010-11, according to the Survey of U.S. State Tourism Office Budgets. All but $2 million of that figure goes into marketing and promotion.

A survey by Ypartnership found that Michigan held its own in 2011 in the minds of potential visitors, with 8 percent of those surveyed interested in visiting, the same as in 2010. New York and California led the survey with nearly half of the respondents expressing interest in visits there.

Among other Great Lakes states, only Pennsylvania (13 percent interested) and Illinois (10 percent interested) drew more interest than Michigan.

“George Zimmermann is doing a terrific job, in a challenging economic environment, to make Michigan a summer seasonal destination,” said Yesawich. “The (Pure Michigan) campaign has done a wonderful job,” he added, “Zimmermann and (advertising firm) McCann Erickson crafted an emotionally provocative campaign. Rather than the traditional recitation of things to see and do, they have personalized the message in the Michigan experience.”

2 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. charlies

    This article certainly diverges from the Center’s cheerleading for the Pure Michigan campaign. To state that the advertising works and then to note that we are not viewed very positively should force Bridge and the Center to reevaluate the sensibility of this activity.

    If the actual results are not enough the economic theory behind the Pure Michigan campaign is the same problem that gave us “too big to fail”. Pure Michigan lets the public pick up the cost or risk of the “investment” while the tourism operators gain the benefit–all with the hopes that private tourism operators with benefit the communities around them through property and sales tax benefits and our parks will draw people that will spend money elsewhere in the communities. The whole network is dubious and wasteful.

  2. Norm

    My tax $$ hard at work, not picking winners or losers, merely making my chaitable donation to the business community.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.