News and analysis from The Center for Michigan •
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at

Original article URL:

Talent & education

The 44-cent solution

What can you buy with 44 cents?

You can get one postage stamp, at least for the next 12 days, when the cost of mailing a letter jumps to 45 cents.

You could buy an eighth of a gallon of gas.

Or you could help turn around the state’s economy.

Michigan families pay more to send their children to the state’s public universities than do the families of almost any other state, according to a new Bridge analysis.  In many cases, over the course of four years, Michigan college students will pay over $10,000 more than their peers in other states pay to attend similar schools.

The reason is as simple as it is puzzling: Michigan has chosen to defund higher education. Our state leaders, who boast that our public university system is among the top in the nation, have stripped support from the schools at a staggering rate. Universities have filled that hole in their budgets by increasing tuition.

We are at an economic disadvantage when Michigan has higher college costs than other states. Some students will be discouraged from enrolling because of the daunting price tag; others will leave campus deeper in debt than college grads in other states.

That’s where your 44 cents comes in.

Cutting every in-state students’ college costs by $1,000 annually, would cost each Michigan residents 44 cents a week.

That amount more would cut student debt by $4,000 (for those getting a bachelor’s degree in four years). Student loan experts say the actual payment on student loans is double the original amount borrowed. That means not borrowing $4,000 actually saves college grads $8,000.

There are about 230,000 full-time, in-state students attending Michigan’s 15 public universities.  If each of them had an additional $8,000 to spend or invest in Michigan instead of plowing it into loan payments, there would be $1.84 billion added to our economy.

All that for 44 cents a week. Double that amount (roughly the cost of that Snickers bar you get from the vending machine), and Michigan student debt could shrink to one of the lowest levels in the nation.

It’s called a public education because it’s good for the public, not just for the kids in the classrooms and dormitories.

Would you be willing to pay 44 cents a week for a better, more affordable college system? Let us know.

Better yet, let your state senator or representative know.

2 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Barry Matthews

    Student Loans impoverish our society to the profit of a few.

  2. Mitch

    There is an equity issue as well when educational funding levels are cut. I have paid taxes all my life to send other people’s kids to college. (Which, as you point out, benefited me and the rest of Michigan as well as the students themselves.) Now I have two sons in college, and they have higher tuition, lower financial aid, and more debt because of funding cuts. They also qualified for Michigan Promise scholarships, but funding for those scholarships was eliminated.

    Michigan will probably come to its senses a few years from now and start funding higher education again. Then my sons will be able to pay taxes for the rest of their lives to send other people’s kids to college.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in teen prison rape suit pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.