News and analysis from The Center for Michigan •
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at

Original article URL:

Public sector

All hail our robotic car overlords!

We all remember the dumb things we did behind the wheels as teens. And parents can regale any cocktail party with stories of what their teenagers are doing behind the wheel today.

So, I doubt there will be much opposition to Senate Bill 756, Sen. Howard Walker’s bid to change the traffic code to bar teenagers (or holders of class 1 and 2 licenses) from using cell phones in their vehicles, except in emergency situations. Distracted driving is bad; phone conversations are distracting, so let’s take action right?

Well, take a look at another exception in the current version of the bill: “The prohibition also would not apply to a person using a voice-operated system integrated into the vehicle.”

I presume this means Sync and the other hands-free systems that are now becoming common in automobiles.

However, as this review points out, being hands-free does not make a driver any less dangerous. In fact, phone conversations, even in hands-free mode, are the equivalent of drunken driving. And this applies whether you are a 16-year-old cheerleader or 55-year-old state legislator.

The research to date shows that talking on a phone in a car is a particularly dangerous thing to do. And, no, it is not the equivalent of chatting with a person in the passenger seat.

Any serious bid to address road safety would treat the use of cell phones, in any fashion, as a threat. And if cell phone use is not particularly distracting, where is the research to show that result? There are plenty of interested parties who could fund research. Is it just possible that those results haven’t surfaced because cell phones aren’t just like every other distraction?

I understand that millions of my fellow Michiganians simply cannot be out of touch for even a nanosecond, so a complete ban on phone use is a practical impossibility at the moment.

So, the only thing that may save us from ourselves are robot cars.

1 comment from a Bridge reader.Add mine!

  1. Thomas W. Donnelly

    As a former driving instructor for 25 years, I saw first-hand how teens think behind the wheel.Any distraction for them was potentially catastrophic. Manipulating a cell phone or (God forbid!) texting while driving brings too much input for the novice driver to process in time to react properly. Adults are no better.
    Why not require all drivers to shut their phones OFF while driving? If one needs to make a call, pull off the road, and have the conversation.Then get back into traffic.
    Driving drunk, tired driving, distracted driving, driving while ill, driving while upset, driving under the influence of prescribed medications that cause drowsiness- these are all causes that fill up the hospitals and the graveyards.
    I shut my phone off while driving and maybe I increase my chances of avoiding a collision.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.