News and analysis from The Center for Michigan •
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at

Original article URL:

Peter Luke:
Eye on the Capitol

Insights into the inside workings of Michigan's state government from a veteran newspaper correspondent.

Primary focus showed Snyder ill-suited for national Republican mood

In the two weeks of Michigan campaigning before packing up his tent and moving the circus to Ohio and parts South, Mitt Romney warned that the application of his Massachusetts health-care overhaul at the federal level would consume that part of America’s soul the auto bailout hadn’t already devoured.

Gov. Rick Snyder didn’t offer a full-throated defense of those views — because he has said quite the opposite. But he did preside over victory, however slim, by the candidate he endorsed.

The narrow ideological parameters that define a presidential nomination contest generally don’t constrict the day-to-day running of a state. But contrast what was said on the stump with what’s being attempted in Lansing and you can see that Snyder is standing outside a shrinking Republican Party tent. Though a governor of Michigan, unless born in Canada, can be easily assigned a slot on the speculative list of presidential running mates, Snyder probably won’t have to wait by the phone this summer.

On the ABC News Sunday morning gabfest two days before the Michigan primary, Snyder said the Affordable Care Act of 2010 that President Obama signed into law could work well inMichigan. He didn’t disagree with fellow Gov. Deval Patrick, D-Mass., that the model for it, authored by predecessor Romney, was doing terrific things inMassachusetts.

Given the media platform, Snyder could have criticized federal health care as a costly intrusion into Michigan’s state affairs, endorsed Romney’s vow to repeal it or simply regurgitated the current GOP talking point that its real mission is to tear down organized religion.

Snyder, instead, was enthusiastic about covering more than 1 million uninsured Michiganians through a state-specific exchange that would “create a marketplace with private people coming in, creating more competition, creating better shopping opportunities for people … (and) be the Michigan variation that we think is really appropriate.”

It would be like Orbitz or Travelocity, he said. Not a big government menace out to trample liberty and deny Grandma her hip replacement, but a friendly little garden gnome of a program, but in a white lab coat.

Michigan House Republicans aren’t sure what the law is — or what the GOP base would do to them if they were to endorse Senate Bill 693, which sets up the framework for a Michigan insurance exchange. Despite warnings from the administration about delay, they say they won’t act until summer. Nor will they appropriate $9.8 million in federal grants to begin planning it.

That particular Sunday, Snyder seemed happier to talk about health care than the Bush-Obama federal checkbook that kept General Motors and Chrysler on life support as they sped through bankruptcy court in 2009. The results are now obvious, as quantified in the quarterly profit statements and monthly sales figures that contradict Romney’s doubts that it was worth it.

President Obama plans to retain his electoral hold on the Midwest through the auto accomplishment. The Detroit Three’s journey out of the abyss, providing it’s sustained, also will be the biggest political gift Snyder is likely to receive during his tenure. But assuming Romney’s the nominee and Michigan is in play in the fall presidential election, Snyder will continue to be asked whether the guy he’s backing was right to oppose a strategy without which his state would be a smoking ruin.

Snyder’s stock answer during the primary campaign was that he’d rather not dwell on history, but look forward. “The bailout worked, the auto industry is working and I’m not going to armchair quarterback it,” he said.

As for trains, Michigan can look forward to the benefits from more than $600 million in Obama administration high-speed rail funding for swifter Detroit-Chicago Amtrak service, which candidate Romney says he’d pull the plug on. Far from dismissing such investment as waste, Snyder said in May that “reliable, fast train service is attractive to businesses that want to locate or expand near it. This investment in our rail system is critical to Michigan’s recovery.”

Snyder and Romney share the characteristics of private-sector accomplishment, goal-oriented statehouse management and a stilted style that suggests the style transition from business to politics isn’t complete. But Michigan’s primary contest revealed the contortions required to skirt the perceived perils of moderation in the current Republican construct. Snyder acts as though the peril doesn’t exist.

Or maybe he doesn’t much care.

Either way, he’s probably glad the circus has moved on. But it will be back soon enough.

Peter Luke was a Lansing correspondent for Booth Newspapers for nearly 25 years, writing a weekly column for most of that time with a concentration on budget, tax and economic development policy issues. He is a graduate of Central Michigan University.

3 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Terry

    Peter: your story is a lot better than, and quite a bit different from, the blurb posted in the e-mail announcing this issue of Bridge. The blurb makes it sound like Snyder’s isn’t tough enough to engage in the “rough-and-tumble world of 21st century partisanship.” Your story instead makes the point that Snyder will support sound policies that benefit Michigan and Michiganders, no matter where the policies come from. Both points might be true, of course . . . . . .

    1. Mike R

      I agree with Terry to some extent, it appears the Governor is performing an awkward yet effective dance. While I am no fan of many of the things the Michigan Republican Machine has done (relegating public education to the trash heap, for one), I have to commend Mr. Snyder for at least making an attempt not to follow the party line. Although he has signed into law virtually every other anti-union, anti-teacher bill presented to him, Mr. Snyder has demonstrated civility and a bit of moderation (gasp!) in refusing to endorse Right to Work or to condemn the auto bailout. He has even expressed support for allowing more, not fewer, immigrants into our state (apparently the only one of his party to do so in the whole nation). He has more backbone and conscience than virtually any of his cohorts in the legislature. It’s just too bad the machinations he has to go through to avoid the wrath of the Republikan Nazional Kommittee under Fuhrer Norquist and Herr Limbaugh.

  2. Joe

    All too soon we forget what Synder has done to the working poor such as cutting the earned income tax benefit and unemployment in favor of tax cuts for business and funding prisons over education. His political posturing for his advantage locally does not undo the previous damage he has done but yes, it could have been worse.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.