News and analysis from The Center for Michigan •
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at

Original article URL:

Public sector

GOP leaders eye state contribution in tweak to MPSERS reform bill

Confronted with concerns that a bill to revamp the teacher retirement system would lead to a mass exodus of veteran teachers this year, Republicans who control the Legislature are tinkering with Senate Bill 1040 to reform the Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System.

Faced with $45 billion in unfunded liability and with contributions from school districts — the main funders of the system — skyrocketing, the Legislature has made passing reforms a priority this year. As originally written, SB1040 increases contributions from members in all phases of the system, raises the retirement age in increments and changes the retiree health-care premium benefit from 90 percent paid by the state to 80 percent.

Last week, Republicans joined with Gov. Rick Snyder in announcing major changes to the bill, among them the removal of a graded retiree health-care premium subsidy for employees hired before July 1, 2012, as well as a requirement that most current employees not receive retiree health-care benefits before age 60.

Previous coverage
on MPSERS reform

Teacher retirement fund has $45 billion hole

GOP fix for MPSERS calls for bigger checks from teachers, retirees

Educators see violation of trust in pension proposal

Teacher pension gaps pop up around Great Lakes

“Retirement is a significant life decision and one that is made with great planning and consideration for the future. These changes to Senate Bill 1040 were made in order to mitigate the impact of the unfunded liability on those nearing retirement,” Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville, R-Monroe, said in a statement.

Sen. Roger Kahn, sponsor of the bill, said he would amend it to include a $140 million contribution from the state’s School Aid Fund. Many MPSERS members have complained, in testimony about the bill, that while the system’s problems are not of their making, they are expected to carry the full cost for mitigating the unfunded liability.

Kahn estimated the changes will reduce the unfunded liability by $15 billion, although the Senate Fiscal Agency did not offer revisions to their original analysis of the bill, which estimated the savings from the now-discarded graded premium and age-60 health-care restriction at $4.1 billion. The original draft of SB1040 was estimated to reduce unfunded liabilities by a total of $9 billion.

Kahn also said Tuesday that money now being held in escrow for retiree health care, imposed via a fee in 2010 and immediately litigated, could play a role in the final solution, although there is no timetable for a court ruling on the fee. That fund was at $296.4 million in September 2011, according to the MPSERS comprehensive annual financial report.

Kahn said the Legislature wants to re-establish pre-funded retiree health-care — which Michigan abandoned in the 1990s — since one factor in the growth of unfunded liability has been the sharp increases in retiree health-care benefits.

“We’ll be having discussions over the next few days (with stakeholders),” Kahn said.

John Olekszyk, who testified about the bill on behalf of the Coalition for a Secure Retirement, an educators group, said the coalition was pleased with the changes.

“It demonstrates a recognition of the concerns and issues we’ve raised during the last couple of weeks,” Olekszyk said. “We think the Legislature should continue to look at pre-funding the health care, as a possible long-range solution.”

Spokespersons for the Michigan Education Association, the state’s largest teachers union, did not return calls seeking comment.

Staff Writer Nancy Nall Derringer has been a writer, editor and teacher in Metro Detroit for seven years, and was a co-founder and editor of, an early experiment in hyperlocal journalism. Before that, she worked for 20 years in Fort Wayne, Indiana, where she won numerous state and national awards for her work as a columnist for The News-Sentinel.

3 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Paul

    Ah yes, the Repugs are finally realizing that an election is upcoming and the only way to insure their re-elections is to ameliorate their draconian legislation. Ha, sorry Bozos too late, you should have thought of that way back in Jan. 2010. We are coming for your scalps in Nov.

  2. Rich

    Well I, for one, rather like the way the Governor and Legislature are bringing expenses into the world of reality.

  3. Badadio Pitts

    yea i mean, the attitude of this paul badee, and other badees like him is typical. luckily the legislature moved past that status quo mindset 2 years ago, and as a result it looks like we may be able to finally bring the state’s finances under control.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

It’s not too late to master the basics of Proposal 1. Here’s a 5-minute version.

Yes, fixing the roads is an urgent need, but no, Proposal 1 isn’t the way to do it

Tax burden Prop 1 would impose too heavy to bear

Todd Courser hits Lansing like a cannonball

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.