News and analysis from The Center for Michigan •
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at

Original article URL:

Guest commentary

Guest column: Congress poised to play ‘Scrooge’ on food aid to needy Michigan families

By Terri Stangl/Center for Civil Justice

With Thanksgiving behind us, people throughout the country are caught up in the mad rush to discover the perfect treasures for their loved ones at the most discounted prices. But deep discounts don’t matter to those who have so little they can’t even buy food. And that’s the case for millions of people in Michigan – our neighbors, the couple down the street, the single mother next door – they don’t have enough money to pay for food, let alone gifts.

The Center for Civil Justice’s statewide Food and Nutrition Program Helpline receives many calls each month from people who confess that they never thought they’d need help, but they have no more savings and are out of food. Last year, in a survey of Michigan households, nearly one in five said they didn’t always have enough money for food. The food budget in such households is sacrificed to pay for housing, heat and water, transportation, medical care, and childcare so parents can get to work.

Terri Stangl is director of the Center for Civil Justice in Saginaw. CCJ "advocates for people in Michigan who need help meeting their basic needs. CCJ uses legal expertise, informed by the experiences of low-income people, to monitor and improve public policy and access to governmental programs and services."

That’s why the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps and now called the Food Assistance Program in Michigan, is so important. More than 18 percent of Michigan households receive benefits. The program puts food on the table for those who would otherwise go without.

The program is heavily monitored, error rates are low, and fraud is aggressively prosecuted. So, it seems shocking that Congress is currently debating cuts to a successful program that – by design – can only be spent on a basic human need: food.

These proposed cuts come at a time when program participation has grown due to greater awareness of the program and continued high unemployment. Yet both the House and Senate have proposed cuts to the program as part of the Farm Bill.

Over the next 10 years, the House Agriculture Committee bill would cut $16 billion from SNAP; the Senate version would cut $4.5 billion. The proposed cuts would take food out of the mouths of those who need it most – our children, senior citizens who have to choose between medicine or food, single mothers who work several jobs to survive, and people struggling to find work in this tough economy.

In 2010, SNAP lifted 3.9 million Americans’ total income above the poverty line. A recent study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that having access to food stamps in early childhood has a positive effect on adults years later, including better health and economic self-sufficiency.

One in four Michigan children now live in poverty; cuts to a program that helps more than three-quarters of a million Michigan children (42 percent of all recipients in the state) is a disinvestment in our own future.

The proposed cuts in SNAP are unconscionable and would only aggravate the despair and difficulties experienced by low-income people – leaving them without the help they need – and deserve – to survive. SNAP only provides people with up to $2.22 per meal. In Michigan, households receive an average of only $267 per month. Why are our legislators looking to take away the tiny bit of help and humanity given to millions of low-income people? Congress is picking on the vulnerable people least able to impact the national debate. SNAP is paid with federal funds that are spent at local Michigan grocers employing Michigan workers.

It is important for those of us who do have enough to eat to speak out against these kinds of cuts. And Congress must reject attempts to balance the budget and preserve tax benefits for the wealthiest by taking food from the tables of those with the least.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan.

6 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. hairman

    You have to be KIDDING. To investigate FRAUD go to the Eastern Market on a SATURDAY..or ANY day and
    see the OVERWEIGHT people buying expensive cuts of meat with BRIDGE CARDS, while talking on their BLACKBERRY’s and then gettining into their Escalades. The Program is a RIPOFF to the taxpayers!!!

  2. Hardvark

    I believe the only way to eliminate the fraud is through a meal service program. If you need to rely on the government for basis nutritional needs than it should be available through community kitchens where school lunch rooms, armories, and church kitchens could provide hot meals three times a day for people in need. I would much rather we spend our tax dollars on supporting those type of opportunities rather than giving out cash equivalents that are easily turned to alchohol, tobacco, drugs or gambling. Recipients could be required to help in the program. If you can’t find a job, at least show up and help out once in a while to earn your free meals.

  3. Matt

    Or stand in line at a convenience store while the person ahead of you uses a bridge card to buy chips, pop and candy and then pulls cash for their smokes, lottos, cigs and beer. I’ve been there too many times. Makes me and tax payers look like a bunch of suckers!

  4. Duane

    I wonder how we survived in my youth when we didn’t have the food programs.

    Is it time to relook at the purpose of the programs, is it time to better understand why people don’t have sufficent moneys for the food the want/need?

    Do we need to develop metrics for the programs so we can better understand what works and why and how we can leverage that experience to other programs?

  5. s.melvin

    All this program of giving food to needy people.areonly enriching the BIG wearhhouse companie Like Cargill, monsanto, del monte.THEY get to EMTY there waerhouse while youubuy for the needey and the volunteer take jobs away from poeple that could be woring in the groceriesstore ( we have lost 6 store ).Plus they poeple on Snap in michigan had there sSNAP cut by Governor Syneders cut in his first year. yes the USDA iussed the amount of $ 217.00 for Senior/Vetreans per months..but the realty is most of our VEtreans donot qualifit (there pensio is under $ 1000/500 ..a months ..It is time for congress yes to CUT that out of the BUDGET.BUT put that amount into there pension/Social Security check//tThe Social security lockbox money need to be payed back from the AIG and Banks… the
    bail-out of $ 1,5 TRILLION is past DUE 2004/12/27/retirement/surplus/ind.We Senior dont want or need an other can of beans(cans have BPA causes cancer) we want to buy from a grocery store and feel equal , we work for over 30-40 years and our Soldier gave there life and offerd there freedom to the USA.Uncle sam time to pay up.

  6. s.melvin

    Snap lifted american above the proverty line. well the provertyline is $ 23,000 but that not most senior 99% and vetreans live below the proverty line some less then $ 400 a months.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

Yes, fixing the roads is an urgent need, but no, Proposal 1 isn’t the way to do it

Tax burden Prop 1 would impose too heavy to bear

Todd Courser hits Lansing like a cannonball

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.