News and analysis from The Center for Michigan • http://thecenterformichigan.net
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at http://bridgemi.com

Original article URL: http://bridgemi.com/2013/01/guest-column-snyder-is-right-to-invest-in-expanded-early-childhood-programs/

Guest commentary

Guest column: Snyder is right to invest in expanded early childhood programs

By Doug Luciani and Debbie Dingell/Children’s Leadership Council of Michigan

As a former venture capitalist, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder knows much about how to calculate return on investment. Today, we applaud him for seeing the ROI in young children.

In his State of the State Address, Snyder acknowledged Michigan has 29,000 4-year-olds eligible for public preschool who are not enrolled because there are not enough slots and he pledged to close, and eventually eliminate, that gap. He said: “It’s important for us to make a major budget commitment to get as many kids as possible and get us on a path to getting all those kids in Great Start and early childhood programs.”

We completely agree!

And now, Snyder has a quick opportunity to reinforce those courageous words with the state budget proposal he will unveil in early February. Senate Appropriations Chairman Roger Kahn has proposed to increase state investment in the state’s public preschool program by $130 million. Superintendent of Public Instruction Mike Flanagan and Speaker of the House Jase Bolger also have called for more investment in early childhood. We are eager to see the governor’s response in his budget. We think early childhood is one of the very best investments this jobs-focused governor can make in our great state. Four reasons why:

“You can’t get there” without it. More than half of Michigan’s fourth-graders are not proficient readers. Solving this problem is the governor’s top goal for elementary education. You can’t get there without expanding high-quality preschool programs, Superintendent Flanagan declares. Research shows big gains in reading and math proficiency for at-risk students who attend the state’s Great Start Readiness (GSRP) preschool program.

“The Forgotten 4-Year-Olds.” Nearly 30,000 eligible 4-year-olds are shut out of GSRP because there are not enough spaces for all the children in need. The $130 million investment proposed by Flanagan and Kahn can go a long way toward solving this problem. For more, read Bridge Magazine’s report on the “Forgotten 4-Year-Olds” at www.bridgemi.com/michigans-forgotten-4-year-olds/.

That Giant Flushing Sound. Michigan taxpayers are spending $100 million per year for more than 13,000 students who flunk kindergarten and must repeat it. The quickest way to solve this unspeakable waste of money and young brains is to assure all children arrive at kindergarten healthy and ready to learn. Maximizing the public preschool enrollment for at-risk students is a key step.

The Business Mandate. More than 120 statewide business executives have worked through the Children’s Leadership Council of Michigan, which we co-chair, to call attention to the urgent and crucial need for a more comprehensive preschool and early learning strategy in Michigan. Business voices across our state are pushing for comprehensive early childhood strategies because early childhood is the best way to give at-risk children a fighting chance to ascend the steep path to success in today’s global economy.

A $130 million expansion of public preschool programs in Michigan will change lives.

As columnist David Brooks puts it, “By age 5, it is possible to predict, with depressing accuracy, who will complete high school and college and who won’t.”

Snyder can literally improve statistical probabilities for young children with his next budget. That’s power. We urge him to exercise it.

Doug Luciani is president of the Traverse City Area Chamber of Commerce and a co-chair of the Children’s Leadership council. Debbie Dingell is president of d2 Strategies and a co-chair of the Children’s Leadership Council.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan.

5 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Bob Sornson

    Early learning success offers unquestionably the best return on public investment. Let’s do it right, by insisting on quality early childhood programs, and by completing the job with parent outreach and education, and with quality K-3 programs.
    These are the three legs to a program that has far-reaching impact, and neglecting quality preschool, quality K-3, or effective parent outreach mitigates the return on investment.

  2. Charles Richards

    Possibly preschool makes a difference for “at-risk” children from low-income, dysfunctional families, but it doesn’t seem to be effective for the general population. Robert Samuelson, in his column of Sept 6, 2010, after noting the dismal state of our education, noted that ” Maybe more preschool would help. Yet, the share of 3- and 4-year-olds in preschool has rocketed from 11 percent in 1965 to 53 percent in 2008.”

    1. Donna Sickels

      I beg to differ on comment about low income dysfunctional families, my friend,who wanted a spotlessly clean house would NOT allow her preschool children crayons pencils paper or anything else that might mess her house. School was where they would learn, that was what school was for. All children learn in preschool, even socializing and behavior is important. I WILL agree that our schools are behind and need a lot of help but money is not the answer to all the problems, caring, involved, interested, parents would be a great help.

  3. SBR

    Currently, only the poorest 4 year-olds in Michigan get taxpayer-funded preschool. I’ll be blunt…that makes it welfare, the same as food stamps, Medicaid, etc. And since when has education become welfare? If pre-K schooling is so important (and I believe it is), why is it not supported for ALL Michigan children? Families who are just above the poverty line don’t qualify and yet cannot afford private preschool. I guess their children are not as important in the eyes of our state officials and legislators. I think the legislature should enact a bill that provides a voucher (let’s say for $3,000) for each 4 year old legal resident in Michigan that the family can use at a public or private preschool. Those that like public education can get a spot at a public program. Those that prefer private education rather then supporting more MEA members can use the voucher at a private program.

  4. Carolyn G

    Here is a topic where we have some bipartisan consensus, what a great place to start ! ALL children need access to high quality preschool programs. And parents should have a choice on what type of program to use. Not all children fit well into every individual program. Not all children fit well into all types of programs.

    Let’s encourage the investment and support for the youngest children, and then figure out how we can make it work for every family!!

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.