News and analysis from The Center for Michigan • http://thecenterformichigan.net
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at http://bridgemi.com

Original article URL: http://bridgemi.com/2013/06/guest-commentary-preschool-funding-boost-praised-but-theres-work-to-do-for-michigans-0-3s/

Guest commentary

Guest commentary: Preschool funding boost praised, but there’s work to do for Michigan’s 0-3’s

By Mina Hong/Michigan’s Children and Scott Menzel/MAISA

FAST START: Michigan’ new investment in preschool classes for 4-year-olds is vital, write Mina Hong and Scott Menzel, but the state still has work to do on programs for infants and toddlers. (courtesy photo/used under Creative Commons license)

FAST START: Michigan’ new investment in preschool classes for 4-year-olds is vital, write Mina Hong and Scott Menzel, but the state still has work to do on programs for infants and toddlers. (courtesy photo/used under Creative Commons license)

The Legislature recently approved an historic expansion of the Great Start Readiness Program – the state’s preschool program for 4-year-olds at risk of being underprepared for kindergarten.  This $65 million increase – a 60 percent expansion of the program – will provide a preschool experience for thousands of children who are currently eligible, but not enrolled in the program.  This will be the most significant move that we’ve seen in recent years to provide support to the 29,000 4-year-olds currently living in Michigan who cannot access GSRP, an unmet need that was uncovered by Bridge Magazine.

As elected officials, business leaders, early childhood providers and advocates alike rejoice in this much needed expansion, it’s important to remember that our work doesn’t end.  A shared priority of the Michigan Association of Intermediate School Administrators and Michigan’s Children over the past several years has been to expand early learning services for young children prenatally through kindergarten-entry.  This includes not only expansion of GSRP, but also concurrent growth in services for young children and their families prenatally through age 3.

Mina Hong is Senior Policy Associate of Michigan’s Children, the only statewide independent voice for children, with a focus on reducing disparities in child outcomes from cradle to career.

Mina Hong is Senior Policy Associate of Michigan’s Children, the only statewide independent voice for children, with a focus on reducing disparities in child outcomes from cradle to career.

Supporting infants and toddlers is critical because their earliest experiences shape their brain architecture, laying the foundations for later learning. Without positive experiences that create strong foundations, learning gaps appear early, sometimes detectable before a child’s first birthday. And these disparities widen as children grow.  By age 2, low-income toddlers are often behind both in cognitive and social-emotional measures. By the time they reach preschool, they’re playing catch up, not moving ahead.

Furthermore, what is now no longer news to folks is that early childhood investments bring significant economic gains. This is true for the Great Start Readiness Program, and this compelling economic argument was one of the drivers of the $65 million expansion. In fact, as Nobel Laureate James Heckman has proven, investments prenatally through age 3 have the greatest return on investment, particularly when they are followed by high quality preschool like GSRP and a high quality K-12 education.

Scott Menzel is superintendent of the Washtenaw Intermediate School District and chair of the Michigan Association of Intermediate School Administrators’ Early Childhood Committee. MAISA is the statewide association of Michigan's 56 intermediate school districts.

Scott Menzel is superintendent of the Washtenaw Intermediate School District and chair of the Michigan Association of Intermediate School Administrators’ Early Childhood Committee. MAISA is the statewide association of Michigan’s 56 intermediate school districts.

As Michigan’s elected officials begin preparing for the fiscal year 2015 budget process, we urge them to consider ways to maximize their strong investment in preschool. In Michigan, we need to increase support for programs that serve young children prenatally through age three. This includes expansion of high-quality child care for working families; evidence-based home visiting services to help parents become their child’s first and best teachers; and Early On early intervention services for young children with identified developmental delays and disabilities that, when left untreated early, may prove to be more challenging to treat later.

By setting children on a clear path toward success, early education provides the greatest benefits for low- and moderate-income children while bolstering Michigan’s economy by building a robust work force for the future. This early investment is crucial for our children, our families and our state.  We applaud the governor and Legislature for recognizing the importance of early childhood education by increasing the state’s preschool investment by such a substantial amount.  This is a necessary first step toward implementing the comprehensive prenatal through post-secondary (P-20) system proposed by the governor.

It took courage from Gov. Rick Snyder and the Legislature to find $65 million this year to expand preschool access, and it will take even more courage to take the next steps to truly realize a P-20 system that begins prenatally and eliminates the achievement gap. But, the economic benefits for our state and the need to ensure all Michigan kids get off to a great start has never been more important.

At MAISA and Michigan’s Children, we will continue to work together on behalf of Michigan’s learners cradle to career, and encourage others to join us in maximizing the state’s preschool investment by following the research: it’s now time to invest in our children from the start.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan.

4 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. ***

    It all starts with the attitude of the parents, they have to care about interacting with their children
    in a positive way starting at birth, providing the kind of environment that will nurture the child
    in a learning environment. A “tough love” approach with the parents is probably going to be resented
    and go nowhere, I’m not sure how this will work but I hope they can come up with something.

  2. Ardvark

    This is just another scheme to replace parental responsibility. Why not just take the children away from their neglectful parents? (sic) We currently are feeding the children 2 meals a day and with pre-school and after school programs, the education system has become the baby sitters for irresponsible breeders. Parenting is a very difficult job when done properly and so many are ill equipped and ill prepared to accept the responsibility. Since this or similar head start programs have been in effect for quite some time, how about reporting on the percentage of really productive members of society that have been developed through these programs? The tax payers want accountability for their investment and are getting tired of social programs that just keep growing without any actual results. Somebody needs to show significant, measurable benefits to society or move on to a program that does. There is something wrong with a system that rewards people for bringing children into the world where they are not able to be cared for or afforded. These poor youngsters become just more casualties of a system built on a false support system that insures perpetual employment for bigger government. Forty years of the “Great Society”, trillions of dollars and what has been accomplished? How sad is that?

  3. Big D

    The State could save a lot of our money by, instead of spending on trying to help the under-parented, stopping the spending on programs that largely contributed to the problem of parental incompetence in the first place.

    The way things are going, after 0-3s, they’ll be talking about the unborn. Oh, wait, those aren’t people, they are a choice. Oh, well.

    Gotta make sure the pliable minds don’t get polluted with ideas like opportunity, personal responsibility, self-improvement, limited government.

  4. eileen

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Kids catch up if the kindergarden/first grade class class is taught correctly. Exactly how does spendiny my money on bad parenting help me, the taxpayer? No one paid for my kids to go to pre-K; I read to them and talked to them. It is not my responsibility to pay for someone else’s kids to get free schooling before school starts – in effect, paying for childcare.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

It’s not too late to master the basics of Proposal 1. Here’s a 5-minute version.

Yes, fixing the roads is an urgent need, but no, Proposal 1 isn’t the way to do it

Tax burden Prop 1 would impose too heavy to bear

Todd Courser hits Lansing like a cannonball

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.