News and analysis from The Center for Michigan • http://thecenterformichigan.net
©2014 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at http://bridgemi.com

Original article URL: http://bridgemi.com/2014/02/three-cheers-for-a-state-budget-that-gets-natural-resources-right/

Brunch with Bridge

Welcome to Brunch with Bridge!
Every Sunday, you'll find in this space one or more guest columns by interesting Michigan residents with something interesting to say about life in our state. We hope you'll find it a place to stop by regularly, read, and comment.

Three cheers for a state budget that gets natural resources right

Michigan enjoys great natural resources. Managed well, they can enhance life in the state for every resident. (Photo by Flickr user Juan N Only; used under Creative Commons license)

Michigan enjoys great natural resources. Managed well, they can enhance life in the state for every resident. (Photo by Flickr user Juan N Only; used under Creative Commons license)

Who thought watching budgets could be exciting? I’ve been watching the roll-out of Gov.Rick Snyder’s new budget with particular interest in what it has to say about natural resources. No doubt there will be special interests who find reasons to criticize the governor’s proposed investments in natural resources, and I expect I will get pushback from both the left and right for this column – however, when a political leader gets it mostly right, I think we need to say so.

As Michiganders, our economy and quality of life are dependent on this state’s beautiful lands and waters. We have the natural assets to recruit and grow businesses based on quality of life we offer their employees and the accompanying ability to attract and retain talent. As we watch parts of the country face long-term drought and water shortages, the rest of the country, and the world, may look to Michigan more and more for sustainable agricultural production, four-season tourism, and access to abundant, high-quality water.

But we will only have those assets to offer if we take care of them. It is high time we had a proposed budget that recognizes the importance of protecting and investing in our natural resources – and outlines a way of doing it that isn’t about pet projects, but rather, anticipating the future and the challenges and opportunities the future will bring.

If my read of it is right, this proposed budget and its investments in natural resources is all about water – water quality, water use, protection and risk mitigation. It is not about trying to turn back the clock to recover long ago budgets, bureaucracy and administrative resources for past programs. It is proposing investments in the science, programs and public/private partnerships needed to understand sustainable use and protection of our resources; to optimize their use while assuring that these resources will still be there, healthy and productive, for future generations.

For business, it means regulating water not to say “no,” but rather to have the science and tools to know when and how to say yes, and assure long-term water quality and watershed health. For farmers, the new Farm Bill and investments like those in this budget are beginning to recognize that we need to incentivize and target practices that reflect how watersheds function and how land management and groundwater use affects the long-term health of the very systems we depend on.

Again, it doesn’t have to be about ‘“no.” Rather, Michigan can emerge as a leader in developing the science, tools and technology of natural-resource use, and be looked to as a model for balancing use with protection. From Detroit, to our state-owned 4.1 million acres of certified sustainable forests, to the increasing demand for groundwater use – let’s show the world how to do it right, how to plan for a sustainable, healthy, beautiful future.

I know everyone has heard the saying “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” – and it couldn’t be more true than with invasive species. When we face such profound risks as we do to our waters, recreation, business, and Great Lakes from invasive species, increased investment is vital.

So much is at risk from many more species than just Asian carp. Scientists are able to name 10 more species with equally destructive capabilities that are poised to enter the Great Lakes, and those are just the ones we know about – it doesn’t account for the work needed to address accidental introductions and pathways through commercial trade, etc.

Prevention will cost far less than the impact if these species become established in Michigan and the governor’s proposal to invest in this issue couldn’t be more timely. And although Michigan acting alone will not be enough to address invasive species, the governor and his team are trying to lead by example. Once we pass this budget, our next challenge will be to assure that the rest of the Great Lakes states and Canadian provinces are giving this issue equal attention and investment.

It shouldn’t go without mention that there are many other valuable components to the proposed budget, including recycling, a long-overdue fisheries research vessel for Lake Huron, and trails that will enhance this beautiful state.

So what can we do? If you agree with the need for this increased investment in the Governor’s budget for natural resources, you need to let it be known. Take time to look at the details, not to get your pet project in there, rather to see if it speaks to you in the same way about looking forward at a world where water is center stage.

Investing in nature, the source of everything we hold dear and depend on, is not only wise, it is essential. Michigan’s water, beauty and natural resources will increasingly be the envy of the world, so let’s invest and lead in having the science, tools, programs and governance that assure a healthy future.

Helen Taylor lives in Lansing, and is state director for The Nature Conservancy in Michigan and a Great Lakes Commissioner. Her favorite brunch dish is yogurt, fruit and nuts, although she’s been known to drive 75 miles for bacon. The views and assertions of guest columnists do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan.

4 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Tom Matych

    This is a good thing, I am very much for investing in and protecting our natural resources and mitigating the impacts of the invasive species, if not get rid of them. Any money should not be used to look like they’re doing something, or try to sugar coat “make lemonade” out of invasive species. An example is recently a “State Record” invasive White Perch was caught in Muskegon Lake, catching “master angler” invasive species is not a good thing, having tons of invasive white perch is als not a good thing. Invasive white perch eat walleye and other fish eggs, eat baby REAL Perch and walleye babys among others. Invasive white perch, have overrun several lakes around the country, are threatening the perch and walleye population in lake Erie, nothing good about having invasive white perch. It is illegal to throw back invasive white perch alive in Indiana, they must be killed immmediately! All states should have this law. But the MDNR fishery Div. is giving out awards for catching record size invasive species. According to Jim Dexter MDNR fishery chief, MLIVE article ” This latest state record once again showcases the quality of the states fisheries” Google invasive white perch see for yourself, not a good thing. People have to realize, whether it’s invasive White Perch, Asian Carp or even alewives, invasive species dominant means that the natural resource or native fishery is just as gone. Zero tolerence for all invasive species, that’s supposed to be the plan, but it doesn’t apply to alewives. If it doesn’t apply to alewives then it appllies to none, making Lake Michigan and connecting waters invasive species friendly (low native predators) for all invasive species. Want Proof? You only have to look at the lake and they’re giving out awards for catching big ones! The top priority is to fill the lake back up with alewives until that changes there is no real plan to control invasive species, and there will fewer real perch and walleye!

  2. Margaret

    AMEN !!!!!!! Let’s be a state and world leader and protect our Great Lakes that we are so very fortunate to have as a part of our beautiful state. Think and research before we act, should be our motto. I love my state and want to preserve and protect all its natural resources and beauty.

  3. Joe

    As an inland lakefront property owner, I pay more than $400 along with thousands of others in this state to counter the effects of farmers and agribusiness that use our inland lakes as septic tanks. Does Synder’s budget take into account the need to create filter strips around lakes and the inlets that supply them to prevent water contamination? Does his budget regulate what a farmer can use as fertilizers (i.e. industrial sludge) and pesticides that directly affect humans, wildlife and water quality?

    1. Helen Tayor

      Joe, I would be happy to talk with you to discuss programs, incentives and research underway to protect water quality and advance compatible agriculture practices–by many institutions, agencies and organizations both public and private, including the recently signed Farm Bill, one of the strongest for conservation in history. You raise important questions and concerns shared by many, and there is great deal of effort underway. Feel free to contact me at htaylor@tnc.org and we can set up a call.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan.Find out why.