News and analysis from The Center for Michigan •
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at

Original article URL:

Michigan Truth Squad

A project of
the Center for Michigan.

Technical foul on Dem ad slamming Snyder

Who Democratic Governors Association
What “The Difference,” a television ad promoting Mark Schauer for governor.
The call Technical Foul

Produced by the Democratic Governors Association, the 30-second ad introduces Mark Schauer, a former state lawmaker and member of Congress from mid-Michigan, to voters statewide. Schauer is a Democratic candidate for governor this year.

He is shown climbing out of a Jeep Grand Cherokee (built at Chrysler’s Jefferson North plant in Detroit). A school classroom is briefly shown as Schauer says that his dad was a science teacher and his mom a nurse. He then talks about how he was in charge of an early childhood education program in Battle Creek and how he pushed for lower interest rates on student loans.

Statements under review:

“We need to stop Gov. Snyder’s cuts to school funding… Let’s tell Governor Snyder, cutting school funding is no way to build a strong economy.”

There is enough gray area on this subject that Snyder can accurately claim education funding is up, while Democrat gubernatorial candidate Mark Schauer can just as accurately claim school funding is down.

Snyder claimed in his State of the State address, though not in the Super Bowl ad, that K-12 spending had increased by $660 per student since he took office. That number reflects total appropriations, which have indeed risen from $12.98 billion in fiscal year 2011 to $13.36 billion appropriated for the current fiscal year, while the number of students has declined.

A lot of that increase has gone toward teacher pension liabilities, which is funding that is not flowing into classrooms. The state’s basic per pupil foundation allowance is down since Snyder took office, from $7,316 in 2010-11 to $7,076 in 2013-14.

(For a detailed breakdown on the school funding debate, see former director of the Michigan House Fiscal Agency Mitch Bean’s analysis)

Under the old Michigan Business Tax, about $600 million had been earmarked for the School Aid Fund. But the new corporate income tax, which took effect in 2012, eliminated that earmark. Business tax revenue now goes to the general fund.

In addition, about $400 million a year from the School Aid Fund is being used differently than in the past – to pay for community colleges and state universities – instead of for K-12 purposes.

“He used that money to give tax breaks to businesses, even if they send jobs overseas.”

In the television ad, Schauer claims that Snyder took the money from schools and gave it to businesses in the form of a tax cut, even to those that sent jobs overseas.

Snyder and the Legislature replaced the complex Michigan Business Tax with a 6 percent corporate income tax that cut business taxes by $1.7 billion.

The biggest beneficiaries of the tax cut were, generally, smaller companies, including “S” corporations, sole proprietorships and limited liability companies that are exempt from the new corporate income tax. Larger corporations, specifically C-corporations, pay the new tax. Those corporations would arguably do the bulk of overseas business, still continue to pay the new corporate income tax. The ad offered no documentation or explanation for the claim that the state tax reform specifically resulted in tax cuts to Michigan corporations that sent jobs overseas. For background on the tax changes, this analysis from the Plante and Moran accounting firm is one of many available resources.

The call Technical Foul

The ad makes a strong implication – that Gov. Snyder gave tax cuts specifically to Michigan firms that send jobs overseas. The ad provides no documentation for that claim. And, in actuality, state business tax changes actually benefitted smaller firms more than the kinds of large corporations more likely to engage in international business.

6 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Michael Rogers

    “And, in actuality, state business tax changes actually benefited smaller firms more than the kinds of large corporations more likely to engage in international business.” Kudos for pointing out the truth about business tax reform — that it mostly helps small, family-owned small businesses that are filling thousands of jobs across the state.

  2. Mike S

    By the definitions that were laid out, this ad should have been marked as a Regular Foul or even a Flagrant foul. “A statement that distorts or incorrectly states a fact. It’s one thing to point out differences between records. It’s another for a public official to present false information”. To say Snyder cut over a billion from education but the fact is that he has increased funding. that makes the DGA a flagrant foul, there are no gray areas the facts are clear.

  3. Barb

    Not really Mike S! If you read Mitch Bean’s analysis, there really has been hurting going on in education; it’s pretty clearly been flat funding with increasing expectations and costs.
    Some even claim in real dollars, back to ’90s levels. It is truly a “call”, and in terms of what students receive, a clear decline.

    I find Gov. Snyder pretty deceptive on things like Right to Work as well, when that snuck through after feigning such disinterest in it. Shortly after, the rules for recall were also quietly changed so he wouldn’t have the Gov. Walker situation occur. It is now close to impossible to recall a MI Gov. You need to line-up the new candidate, get an uncommon amt. of names in a shorter period of time etc. etc. I don’t see Gov. Snyder as a forthright “nerd” at all, just a typical businessman, and you can’t run certain entities like businesses,— schools and mental health are two such entities. The only way to reform is through long-term focus and protecting education from the ongoing politicization of MI legislators, who yo-yo schools’ efforts all over the place.

  4. Abbie Hoffman

    Your foul call:
    ‘The ad makes a strong implication – that Gov. Snyder gave tax cuts specifically to Michigan firms that send jobs overseas.’

    That’s not at all what the ad said. It says ‘businesses, even if they send jobs overseas.’ To me ‘even if’ is the opposite of ‘specifically’

    Sorry, bad call.

  5. Jeffrey Miller

    The new corporate tax as you call it put a huge hole in the budget that was filled be education and too many other cuts and taxes!

  6. J. Strate

    It’s important to examine the truth of the claims about state funding for education. Although it’s true that no school district can run their schools without money (including especially state funding), it’s not likely that small variations in state funding from year to year have much if anything to do with the academic performance of students. Indeed, if there’s any relationship between per pupil spending and academic performance, it’s likely very weak. Is there any way of getting elected public officials to focus on outcomes (educational performance) rather than inputs (state funding for education)? I doubt it, since the numbers there don’t look so good.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.