News and analysis from The Center for Michigan • http://thecenterformichigan.net
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at http://bridgemi.com

Original article URL: http://bridgemi.com/2014/05/foul-on-anti-peters-senate-ad-hammering-obamacare/

Michigan Truth Squad

A project of
the Center for Michigan.

Foul on anti-Peters Senate ad hammering Obamacare

Who: Americans For Prosperity
What: TV ad “Tell Gary Peters To Speak For Us”
The call: Foul

Relevant text of the ad

“Are you one of the 225,000 Michiganders? That’s how many plans could be canceled because of Obamacare. Can you really afford to pay thousands more? Your health plan canceled, your doctor lost, all because congressman Gary Peters said yes to Obamacare. Now Peters has no regrets. He’d do it to us again. Tell congressman Peters to speak for us and stop supporting Obamacare.”

The 30-second TV ad sponsored by Americans For Prosperity continues earlier attacks against the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. It also targets U.S. Rep. Gary Peters, a Democrat, who is running for U.S. Senate against Republican Terri Lynn Land, a former secretary of state. AFP is backed by billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch. It has thus far spent more than $5 million in ads attacking Peters. Peters voted for the Affordable Care Act.

Statements under review:

“Are you one of 225,000 Michiganders? That’s how many plans could be canceled because of Obamacare.”

The statement refers to an Associated Press report in November that stated 225,000 state residents “could be subject to having their policies discontinued.” The calculation was attributed to the state insurance department. A week later, state officials announced that health insurers would be allowed to reinstate canceled policies. It is unknown how many residents actually had policies canceled.

For context, it is worth noting more than 272,000 Michigan residents enrolled as of March 31 in the individual marketplace under the Affordable Care Act. Nearly nine in 10 received financial assistance in the form of tax credits in buying a plan. A RAND Corporation national survey estimated that one-third of those who enrolled in the individual marketplace were previously uninsured. It calculated that 9.3 million Americans gained health insurance as of mid-March as a result of the Affordable Care Act. In addition, expansion of Medicaid authorized under the Affordable Care Act gave insurance to more than 259,000 low-income Michigan residents as of May 19.

“Can you really afford to pay thousands more? Your health plan canceled, your doctor lost, all because congressman Gary Peters said yes to Obamacare.”

While the percentage of uninsured in Michigan has clearly dropped under the Affordable Care Act, it is unclear how many residents might be paying “thousands more” in premiums because of the act. Premiums in some cases could be expected to rise because it mandates that insurance include essential health benefits, including emergency services, hospitalization, prescription drugs, maternity care, mental health and substance abuse treatment and others. Policies sold in the past were less expensive because they were often marketed to healthy individuals with low projected medical costs. Policies now must be sold to anyone regardless of pre-existing condition. And insurers can no longer cap annual or lifetime cost – all of which could be expected to contribute to higher premiums for some who buy policies on the individual market but don’t qualify for tax credits.

The Affordable Care Act retains the essential insurance structure that existed before. Insurance plans before often offered restricted physician and provider networks in exchange for lower premiums. That has not changed under the Affordable Care Act. Peters spokesperson Haley Morris called the add “a desperate distraction from Land’s anti-middle class agenda that’s out of touch and would hurt Michigan women.”

The call: Foul

The ad offers no concrete evidence that 225,000 residents actually stood to lose policies because of the Affordable Care Act. As noted above, the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services informed insurers they could reinstate policies canceled if they did not meet provisions of the act. As also noted, enrollment numbers for the individual marketplace and Medicaid expansion indicate that well over 200,000 Michigan residents have insurance now that did not have it before. The ad does not document the number of residents paying “thousands” more in premiums. Nor does it document that access to physicians is more limited under the Affordable Care Act.

6 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Eugenia Obrecht

    Since the Affordable(?) Care Act has been passed, my supplemental insurance premiums have gone up three times. My friend has been denied the nutrient she needs to sustain her life through Medicare because they claim it is a food, not a medicine so the cost will no longer be covered. Without this nutrient, (TPN), she will not survive.

    1. Gary

      I am saving money thanks to Obamacare. I get a break of $400 each month.

    2. Rick

      Medicare? What does that have to do with the Affordable Care Act?

      You realize Medicaid, Medicare and ACA are different things, right? There are some ‘links’ in terms of eligibility but the benefits, etc. are different and distinct.

  2. s.melvin

    YOUR are the TRUTH : Well check with the CRAIN rBusiness 5/19/2014 11;53 AM
    and find out HOW MUCH MONEY CITiZEN GET BACK FROM BLUE CROSS Blue Shield of Michigan and Hi-LEX Controls

    VARNUM LLP etc. and MSN .com /money and Consumers UNION REPORT 7/4/2012 6 MILLION BACK TO CONSUMERS

  3. Bruce McFee

    Since the ad couldn’t support the figure of 225,000 losing policies do to the ACA, I would like to go on record that our 29 employees representing 80 people (with family members) just lost theirs.

    Incidentally, we have provided good full family health insurance at no cost to our employees for decades. In all the years, I have never had a health insurance company cancel us. However on April 25, 2014, we received a letter from McLaren indicating that they are withdrawing from the small group market place and there will be no renewal available.

    In place they have offered an on-Exchange program that costs much more, curtails providers and offers no out of network coverage whatsoever. It looks like if you want to go to Cleveland Clinic, you’re on your own. Based on preliminary quotations from other insurers, I’m expecting to see a 40% increase in our premiums and considerable disruption to our employees medical service.

  4. phoenix

    Your Bridge to nowhere is now a bridge that is out in it’s attempt to put a happy face on Obamacare. And for those who are happy that
    they now pay less or, pay nothing at all for their “Obamacare insurance”, your glee at others paying for your healthcare is truly a mark of
    a system slavery. Embrace your chains.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.