News and analysis from The Center for Michigan •
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at

Original article URL:

Economy & competitive position

Tension on Au Sable and Manistee rivers

The Anglers of Au Sable have campaigned against oil and gas development near the Blue Ribbon trout stream. (Photo by Flickr user Arvind Govindaraj; used under Creative Commons license)

The Anglers of Au Sable have campaigned against oil and gas development near the Blue Ribbon trout stream. (Photo by Flickr user Arvind Govindaraj; used under Creative Commons license)

To hear Anglers of the Au Sable First Vice President Tom Baird tell it, the Au Sable and Manistee Rivers, which flow east and west, respectively, from their headwaters north of Grayling, boast some of the most pristine recreational waters in the state. Trout fishermen flock here every spring and stake out angling spots in the “Holy Waters,” an 8.7-mile stretch of the Au Sable known for its wadeable water, dependable insect hatches and quality trout fishing.

Last October, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources approved the lease of property along the Holy Waters for oil and gas development, raising the specter of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, wells next to the trout stream. The Anglers of the Au Sable cried foul and launched a campaign that American Angler magazine dubbed the “holy wars.” In response, DNR director Keith Creagh in December changed the leases along the Holy Waters to prohibit above ground development.

“We can accomplish our oil and gas management goals in this corridor without surface development,” Creagh said at the time. “Advances in technology allow us to limit surface use. We look forward to working with citizens to identify special places where surface development should be limited.”

Doug Hock, Encana’s director of community and public relations, held out the option that the company could still use horizontal drilling to access mineral resources near the river.

“We have a good working relationship with DNR and Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ),” said Baird, “but we are critical of some of their efforts… We see a need to remain vigilant with respect to actions of industry, the DNR and DEQ.”

There have been other tensions between the Anglers and Encana. In 2011, a north branch of the Manistee River near Grayling nearly dried up; the Anglers claim Encana’s fracking operation nearby was the culprit. Encana has also pushed for new frack pads carrying multiple wells near the Manistee and Au Sable headwaters.

The Anglers’ concerns about fracking have evolved from the chemicals and risks of pollution to the amount of fresh water used — potentially as much as 35 million gallons per well, according to a study of permit applications.

“We’re starting to learn that the possibility of pollution from two miles underground is fairly low,” said Baird. “The big issue is water use. They’re pulling fresh water from nearby aquifers to the surface. That causes a drawdown of the aquifer, and can have an adverse effect on streams and rivers and their flow.”

Jacob Wheeler lives in Leelanau County. He edits and publishes the Glen Arbor Sun and Betsie Current newspapers.

7 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Donna Sickels

    Michigan has plenty of water, like we are never going to run out of water as in the west.Drought!! What happens when just one of these fracked wells pollutes just one river? Who is going to clean the river and what ever it runs into. like Lake Michigan.I disagree with fracking, I believe there should be a limit on how many wells are fracked and where they are located.

  2. Bob From The North

    OK Donna, What happens when You have to heat Your home or have to drive Your car with coal or maybe You prefer wind powered cars or sunshine (only) heated houses. Fracking is Very safe and unless You are getting Your drinking water from the fracked depth, there is a better chance of winning the lotto than fracked water getting into drinking water. As for fishing? Have You ever been out west to Yellowstone or to New Zealand fishing where poisons (acids) by the billions of gallons are supplying the waters for rivers and the best fishing in the world is to be had. Take a pill and chill out. You and all Your tree hugging 19th century way of lifers need to get Your head out of the democrat party posterior and enjoy life.

    1. David

      Bob, it’s possible to respond to her concerns without name calling.

  3. NIck

    In response to Bob… better get your head out of your own sand pile and understand that resources are limited and they must be protected at any cost! Sustainability is the new mantra Bob. The rest of the world is trying to consume like we do and that spells doom for all of us. We are polluting at a lesser rate but still have a ways to go before we stop killing ourselves with air and water pollution. Even in the more pristine northern reaches of Michigan pollutants have been found. They are carried by the wind and end up in our lakes and rivers. Our rate of consumption must be curtailed and brought into a realistic reusable system of manufacturing and reuse of raw resources. Our addiction to oil is out of control. Think about your children and their children when you make statements like you have Bob! And as far as political parties are concerned, both are ignorant and unable to see the future they are leaving us.

  4. Eunice Burns

    Bob from Up North, What happens when your water supply is either gone or severely polluted? What do you use? One fact that is often forgotten is that water is a finite resource and our fresh water supply MUST be protected!!! And we should be thinking of it now because we want to protect it for our future generations. Even though it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, at this point in time to get along without gas and oil products, try to get along without water for 7 days and you are either dead or close to it.

  5. Michael

    Fracking proponents argue for energy independence. In truth, the companies drilling in Michigan just want to sell cheap gas to China. The cost in water, and the extreme danger of pollution and lasting damage to Michigan’s environment and way of life, makes the trade off a losing proposition in Michigan. Stop fracking in Michigan.

  6. thomas bradley

    As I read with disbelieve that the head of the dnr will limit above ground development along the 8.7 mile stretch. As a past employee of dowell In Kalkaska. Here are the facts. First a drilling rig has to be moved to the site. Second if they hit pay dirt they will put a tree on the well bore. Third not all wells need to be fracked. Some wells will flow on their own and others need a pump to bring the fluid to the surface. There are a couple of wells on the Boardman at Schecks camground . Just my insight so the dnr is wrong saying on above ground development will be limited.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.