News and analysis from The Center for Michigan •
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at

Original article URL:

Michigan Truth Squad

A project of
the Center for Michigan.

Foul on ad accusing Gary Peters of supporting carbon tax

Who: Terri Lynn Land for Senate
What: Web ad, “The Job Killers”
The call: Regular Foul

Relevant text of the ad:

“Peters supported carbon taxes that would have hiked utility bills, raised gas prices by 20 cents a gallon and killed up to 96,000 Michigan jobs. It was called the largest tax increase in American history, and Gary Peters voted for it. …. Peters … is bankrolled by billionaire radical Tom Steyer. Peters also supports Steyer’s call to kill the Keystone Pipeline.”

The one-minute Web ad focuses on differences in energy policy positions between U.S. Senate candidates Terri Lynn Land, a Republican and former secretary of state, and U.S. Rep. Gary Peters, a Democrat. It also targets Peters’ campaign support from wealthy philanthropist and environmentalist Tom Steyer.

Statements under review:

“Peters supported carbon taxes that would have hiked utility bills, raised gas prices by 20 cents a gallon and killed up to 96,000 Michigan jobs.”

Those figures are based on a National Association of Manufacturers report.

The report makes the case for a negative economic impact of a carbon tax. The report states that a carbon tax, if implemented in 2013 (it wasn’t), could have had led to a “loss of worker income” in Michigan equivalent to 75,000 to 96,000 jobs by 2023. While the economic impact may be similar, it’s not the same as 96,000 jobs actually being lost.

More relevant, the report measures the impact of a hypothetical carbon tax that Peters has no record of supporting. Peters did vote in 2009 in support of the American Clean Energy and Security Act, which proposed a cap-and-trade emissions policy for industry.

A cap-and-trade policy focuses on lowering emissions; a carbon tax focuses on making carbon-based energy more expensive.

Land campaign spokesperson Heather Swift says the ad’s contention that Peters supports a carbon tax is based on Peters voting against an amendment this year to deem a carbon tax a “major rule” that would require Congressional approval to be implemented. House Republicans voted 225-0 for the amendment; Democrats voted 176-12 against.

A vote against Congressional control of carbon tax implementation is not the same as supporting a carbon tax, though the Land campaign cited to Truth Squad several articles written at the time of the vote that referred to Democrats voting against a “carbon tax.”

A cap-and-trade policy might also slow job growth, according to projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and the Energy Information Administration, with projections varying wildly depending on economic assumptions.

“It was called the largest tax increase in American history, and Gary Peters voted for it.”

The American Clean Energy and Security Act, which Peters voted for but which did not become law, was labeled as “likely to be the biggest tax in American history” in a 2009 editorial in the Wall Street Journal.

“Peters … is bankrolled by billionaire radical Tom Steyer. Peters also supports Steyer’s call to kill the Keystone Pipeline.”

The ad cites a New York Times article that chronicles Steyer’s contribution of $100 million to the Senate Majority PAC that supports the election of Democrats to the Senate. The Senate Majority PAC has aired several ads in support of Peters.

The ad also cites a Weekly Standard article that claims Steyer is “bankrolling Senate candidate Gary Peters.” So far, Peters and his political action campaign haven’t receive any money directly from Steyer or Steyer’s Super PACS.

The two campaigns differ on the impact of the Keystone Pipeline, but it’s clear that Peters is an outspoken opponent of the pipeline, which would carry tar sands oil from Canada through the United States to the Gulf Coast.

The call: Regular Foul

Peters’ campaign is being aided at least indirectly by cash from billionaire Steyer, just as Land’s campaign has benefitted from ads aired by Americans for Prosperity, a group funded by billionaires Charles and David Koch. Peters is an opponent of the Keystone Pipeline. Peters voted for a cap-and-trade policy that, if implemented, may have slowed job growth. But instead of focusing on cap-and-trade, the ad claims Peters supports a carbon tax and cites a study that links a carbon tax to the loss of 96,000 Michigan jobs. Linking Peters to support of a carbon tax is a misrepresentation of Peters’ record.

2 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Sam melvin

    Keystone Oil.sands are coming from canada to huston and then SLD to JAPAN . while our country being abused and soiled with all kinds of chemical, There is so much fracking going on thet we alll soon will be one big sinkhole …but the gasoline prices are not comming down back to $0.97 before Bush, Br oil is sendding our oil to canada now .
    P>S the minmum wages in Canada is $ 11.00 and what do we have? another pothole
    In Europa the minmum wages is $ 11,75 EU

  2. Mrs A

    When political ads broadcast, does ANYBODY (besides the Truth Squad) actually leave the sound up or not skip through them on the DVR? I won’t even watch ads for candidates I support. They all play like pre-WWII propaganda.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.