The beta version of our new website is now available. Switch to beta – you can come back to our original site at any time.

News and analysis from The Center for Michigan • http://thecenterformichigan.net
©2017 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at http://bridgemi.com

Original article URL: http://bridgemi.com/2016/10/gop-spending-claim-in-state-house-race-earns-foul/

Michigan Truth Squad

A project of
the Center for Michigan.

GOP spending claim in state House race earns foul

anti-scripps

Who Michigan Republican Party
What Flyers in 101st District State House race
The call Foul

Democrat Dan Scripps, a Northport attorney and former one-term legislator, and Republican Curt VanderWall, owner of a lawn care and pest control service (Turf Control Mole Man) in Ludington, are running for the Michigan House of Representatives in the 101st House District, which covers Mason, Manistee, Benzie and Leelanau counties. The current representative of the 101st District, Ray Franz, R-Onekama, is serving his last term because of term limits.

Residents in the district have received several flyers paid for by the Michigan Republican Party making critical claims about Scripps’ time in the Legislature.

Relevant statements

“Dan Scripps racked up record-breaking budget deficits and unemployment rates during his time in office. But he still voted for unlimited lifetime healthcare benefits for former state lawmakers, costing Michigan families billions of dollars.”

Statement under review

“Dan Scripps racked up record-breaking budget deficits and unemployment rates during his time in office.”

Scripps served as a member of the House of Representatives for one two-year term, 2009-10, in the depths of the Great Recession. In both years Scripps served in Lansing, legislators and Gov. Jennifer Granholm struggled with huge budget deficits of more than $1 billion, brought on in part by plummeting tax revenue. His term also corresponded with the highest unemployment rate in Michigan since the 1980s. When Scripps and other legislators entered the capitol to begin the 2009-10 term in January, 2009, the state unemployment rate was 11.2 percent, and it was 11.2 percent when the term ended in 2010. The jobless rate peaked at 14.9 percent in June, 2009.

Stretching credulity like cheap taffy, though, is the suggestion that a first-term representative, who came into office when the state economy was already in freefall, somehow “racked up” the deficit and unemployment rate. The state Legislature was consumed during 2009-10 with cutting costs to balance the budget, not passing policies to run up more red ink or put more people out of jobs, as the flyers imply.

“But he still voted for unlimited lifetime healthcare benefits for former state lawmakers, costing Michigan families billions of dollars.”

Here’s where the claims go from stretching the truth to snapping it, setting it on fire and then running it over with a pickup truck.

A representative of the Michigan Republican Party, responding by email to a Bridge inquiry, said this claim is based on Scripps’ vote on HB 4194

All legislators elected after March 1997 who served at least six years in either the House or Senate were eligible for state retiree health insurance benefits, with the state picking up 90 percent of the cost of the premiums, when they turned 55. HB 4194, passed in 2010, eliminated retiree health insurance for future legislators.

An email from the Michigan Republican Party said:

“The bill we’re referencing in the mailer is House Bill 4194 of 2010. When the House voted on the bill, Dan Scripps voted yes. The bill would allow for all legislators elected prior to 2010 to receive lifetime health benefits if they served for at least six years.”

Not to put too fine a point on this, but this is the sort of claim that explains why voters distrust politicians.

Retired legislators were getting taxpayer-funded health insurance before HB 4194. The bill, rather than give veteran legislators health coverage, took away that sweet benefit for all future legislators. That’s a cost savings for taxpayers. As the Senate Fiscal Agency analysis of the bill explains, the bill “would reduce costs to the Legislative Retirement System,” with the savings growing over time as more legislators who would have gotten state health insurance retire.

To say Scripps “voted for unlimited lifetime health care benefits for former state lawmakers” is not only wrong – Scripps did the exact opposite.

And he wasn’t alone. The bill passed the House 103-1, and the Senate 28-10.

The flyers also claim Scripps’s actions to allow former legislators to get state-funded health insurance would cost Michigan families “billions.” According to the House Fiscal Agency, the state spent $4.7 million on legislative retiree health care benefits in 2007-08. At that rate, to save “billions,” (Truth Squad will low-ball “billions” at $2 billion), would take 425 years.

Truth Squad sent a follow-up email to the Michigan Republican Party with its concerns over the logic used in the flyer, but did not get a reply.

Republican candidate VanderWall, who did not pay for or prepare the flyer, also did not return an email inquiry about the claims made.

The call Foul

In a truly Orwellian effort, the Michigan Republican Party ad argues that a vote that will cut retirement benefits for legislators is actually a vote that will cost the state “billions,” with the justification for that claim as thin as the paper you’d be reading this on if computers were never invented.

5 comments from Bridge readers.Add mine!

  1. Phil L.

    I recently drove to Ludington to go hiking at the state park there. Curt Vanderwall has yard signs distributed along the MI-10 highway like they are nickel halloween candy. Surprisingly though (given a Republican area), few Trump signs.
    Typo alert: fourth paragraph from end senate vote was 28 to 10.

    1. Nancy Derringer

      Fixed, thanks.

  2. Barry Visel

    Analysis is good and appreciated. References to taffy and pickup trucks reduces the impact.

  3. David

    Thanks for vetting this type of negative, false-advertising (which has become so pervasive in election politics). At least we know who was responsible for THIS one — the Republican Party (versus similar, harmful “dark-money” drivel). I was aware of a previous attempt to falsely “spin” Dan Scripps’ sponsorship of legislation to control corporate exploitation of state aquifers as an attack/tax on private water-well ownership. What a sad contrast to the integrity this young man possesses; and, beyond that, has demonstrated (especially as a former state representative) in “building bridges” for passing bi-partisan meaningful legislation on behalf of ALL Michiganders! What a challenge it has become for voters to be well-informed in a sea of polluted media propaganda; Bridge seems to be a “candle on the water.”:)

  4. Dawn_S

    I saw a similar situation happen in Clarkston area (43rd District – Republican heaven) when the Republican party put out a postcard sized message to the voters in the area to vote for Jim Tedder, a former teacher and music DJ running for office for the first time. It also stated that the Democratic candidate for State representative who had previously been mayor of Clarkston (never served in Lansing), had had an affair with Jennifer Granholm, the previous Dem governor… It was a bald-faced lie and the candidate, Jim Tedder, knew it. When faced with the lie put out on his behalf, he said something to the effect of, “Ii didn’t know anything about that and had nothing to do with it.” What a crock of sh*t. It was delivered on the Saturday before the Tuesday election which gave no time for the Dem candidate, a long time resident with a wife and family, to correct the falsehood.

    I was standing outside my polling place holding a sign for a school board member when I met the campaign manager for Jim Tedder who was holding up his sign. She had talked about how unhappy she was with the direction of the campaign, but didn’t elaborate. A while later, the wife of the Democratic candidate arrived to hold up her husband’s sign. There was immediate animosity as they knew each other and the wife brought up the postcard. She said that Jim Tedder claimed he had no knowledge of the advertisement, but her body language said otherwise. As a result, I would never even consider voting for Jim Tedder. He’s running for re-election this year.

    The Democratic party may do nasty things also, but I have not heard of any similar examples to what the Republican party has done.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.