Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

New reports ID five housing ‘hot spots’ in Michigan

metzger-350Michigan’s housing stock is thinning, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, which pegged the state as one of only two with fewer housing units in 2012 than in 2010. Neighboring Illinois is the other.

But the state of housing is far from equal across Michigan. In fact, there are growing hot spots for housing – areas that, not coincidentally, are showing increases in jobs and wages, too.

Housing Unit Change by State, 2010-2012

While the trends are not surprising, one must understand that “housing loss is imputed by the Census Bureau based on type and age of housing due to a lack of available data on actual demolitions. Thus, while these statistics are useful for distinguishing rapidly growing states and counties from those that are growing slowly or declining, they have a substantial margin of error that prevents making reliable distinctions among states and counties with similar patterns.”

Wayne and Genesee counties were, by far, the largest losers of housing stock. The majority of this loss is attributable to the demolition of vacant and dangerous buildings in the core cities of Detroit and Flint. The other large housing losers tended to be urban core counties of Michigan’s metropolitan areas.

Housing Unit Change by County in Michigan, 2010-2012

But 22 of Michigan’s 83 counties did gain housing units during the period. These were led by Ottawa, Macomb, Kent, Grand Traverse and Washtenaw counties where demand for housing has really bounced back with the end of the economic and housing crises that Michigan has weathered.

This recovery is confirmed via new stats from the U.S. Department of Labor in its latest “County Employment and Wages” report for the 4th Quarter of 2012, which indicate continued housing growth in these areas.

While no Michigan county made it into the top tier of percent growth in employment or wages between the 4th Quarters of 2011 and 2012, the results for several were extremely positive.

The state of Michigan matched the nation as a whole with a 1.9 percent growth in employment between December 2011 and December 2012. Leading the charge for the 10 most populous Michigan counties were Ottawa, Oakland and Kent counties, with growth rates of 3.8, 3.4 and 3.0 percent, respectively.  This resulted in national rankings of 20th, 33rd and 52nd.  Washtenaw County also experienced an employment growth rate above the state average.  In spite of housing unit losses, both Wayne and Genesee did experience employment growth in the one percent range.

Employment Growth, December 2011 – 2012, in Select Michigan Counties

The results for wage growth were not quite as positive. While Michigan wages increased by 2.3 percent over the year, this was less than half the rate of growth for the nation as a whole. Our average weekly wage also dropped below the national average, standing at 95 percent of the U.S. average.

Wage Growth, 4th Quarter 2011 – 2012, in Select Michigan Counties

While no Michigan county matched national growth, several fared much better than the state as a whole. Kalamazoo County led all others with a 4 percent increase. This was followed by Washtenaw, Oakland and Kent counties. Ottawa County, while experiencing strong employment growth, showed little change in wages. Genesee County wages were the only ones to decrease. Average weekly wages exceeded the national average only in southeast Michigan. Oakland County came in at 114 percent, followed by Wayne, Washtenaw and Macomb at 108 percent, 103 percent and 101 percent, respectively.

How impactful was this article for you?

Business Watch

Covering the intersection of business and policy, and informing Michigan employers and workers on the long road back from coronavirus.

Thanks to our Business Watch sponsors.

Support Bridge's nonprofit civic journalism. Donate today.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now