Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues
See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:
- “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
- “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
- “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.
If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!
Opinion | History repeats: Why Grand Rapids picked a Dem for Congress
Share this:
November 2022 and February 1974 have something in common. In two widely separated episodes of national tension and polarization, Grand Rapids voted to send Democrats to Congress. This year, for only the second time in 48 years, Democrats grabbed the historically Republican seat once held by Gerald Ford. It’s an outcome that may also be a window on the next election.
This year’s winner, Democrat Hillary Scholten, is a Grand Rapids attorney and lay church leader who reached across the divide to court independents and Republicans disaffected by Donald Trump. 1974’s winner was Democrat Richard VanderVeen, a Grand Rapids attorney and lay church leader who reached across the divide to court independents and Republicans disaffected by Richard Nixon.
In 2022 Scholten benefited when the incumbent Congressman Peter Meijer (R-Grand Rapids), one of ten GOP members of the House who voted to impeach Donald Trump, was defeated in the August primary by John Gibbs, a former Trump administration official.
In 1974 VanderVeen, the Democrat, benefited from his Watergate clarion call to put Gerald Ford in the White House, boxing his GOP opponent, Robert VanderLaan, who could neither support nor oppose the pronouncement. Through those cracks in the door Scholten and VanderVeen were able to appeal to west Michigan’s moderate middle, small but large enough to make a difference when things feel awry. Being offended is one of those things.
VanderVeen’s victory shocked official Washington to its core. None were more surprised than the nation’s new vice president who, hearing from an aide that VanderVeen had won, told him he’d mistaken one Dutch name for the other. No such luck. GOP leaders quickly realized that if Republicans couldn’t hold Jerry Ford’s seat, few would be safe. As VanderVeen succinctly put it on his first day in Congress, “I am here and there is no mystery as to why.”
Scholten’s victory, skillfully flipping a newly competitive seat from R to D, is also on national radar. While she benefited from redistricting, Proposal 3, and by Peter Meijer’s involuntary absence from the general election ballot — an outcome disingenuously advantaged by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee — there was another dynamic at play. Exit polls show that independent voters had been turned off by candidates with close ties to Donald Trump. Gibbs’s focus on 2020 election fraud (something literally unknown in west Michigan) and his views on women and abortion that Democrats advertised as extreme defined him in ways he could not overcome.
2022 saw the Michigan GOP with its worst election performance in a generation. Every statewide candidate was defeated. The state house and senate both flipped from Republican to Democratic control.
The results in Michigan mirror what happened in other swing states where a number of high-profile candidates personally advanced by Donald Trump were turned away. Presidential campaigns can’t succeed without winning most of the swing states. It’s why Trump’s efforts to reverse his defeat focused on Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona — states he’d carried in 2016 but lost in 2020. They will be key again to winning in 2024.
Is another GOP reckoning again at hand? In 1974, the GOP leadership decided that Richard VanderVeen’s win meant saying goodbye to Richard Nixon. Will today’s GOP leaders conclude that swing-state victory in 2024 means Trump or no Trump? To quote from Shakespeare, “that is the question.”
Related
Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission. If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, email your submission or idea to guestcommentary@bridgemi.com. Click here for details and submission guidelines.