Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues
See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:
- “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
- “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
- “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.
If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!
Opinion | Michigan’s economy on track, but new bank rule could derail our progress
Share this:
After years of economic turmoil and setbacks, Michigan’s economy is finally on track for a full recovery. Unemployment is holding near a record low, budget surpluses are increasing, and with crucial support from President Biden’s American Rescue Plan, our state is diversifying its economy and making substantial investments to emerge stronger than ever from the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a member of Michigan’s House of Representatives, I take seriously the responsibility to advocate for the interests of my constituents in Calhoun County. My tenure provides me with insight into the challenges facing our community, and with thoughtful policies, I believe our hard-working residents can overcome these hurdles. I know that higher capital requirements make it more expensive for the banks our business sector relies on to provide financial support to local entrepreneurs. It is this firsthand experience that drives my opposition to the proposed hike in capital requirements for banks — a rule that I fear will set us on a more challenging course.
The Federal Reserve’s proposal seeks to overhaul the capital requirements for large banks, reflecting a global trend where regulators emphasize financial stability and risk mitigation through tougher capital standards. Yet, this well-intentioned proposal might inadvertently hit neither target. The imposition of such a measure could force banks to slash lending, triggering a credit crunch where even the most creditworthy borrowers struggle to secure loans. Instead of securing the financial system, this rule might create a landscape where both stability and growth are elusive. Needless to say, that is the last thing that Michiganders and our businesses need.
Small, community-based businesses are the driving force behind Michigan’s economic engine. Our state boasts over 900,000 small businesses, employing 1.9 million people, and this proposal could jeopardize tens of thousands of Michigan jobs. These entrepreneurial ecosystems often rely on external financing to fuel growth and sustainability. However, the proposed rule changes would significantly hinder their ability to access the necessary funds to expand, innovate and remain competitive. This would inevitably lead to a decline in entrepreneurial activity, fewer job opportunities and an overall slower pace of economic growth.
Unfortunately, the problems with this plan don’t stop there. These new capital requirements may discourage investments in crucial infrastructure projects, as higher capital costs could make these projects less financially viable. My hometown of Battle Creek is in the process of expanding its advanced air mobility park with the potential for many new jobs. If this rule goes into effect, investments in these manufacturing, training and maintenance facilities could be delayed or not pursued at all.
As regulatory discussions proceed in Washington, the consequences of these policies will ripple across towns and cities nationwide, affecting hard-working Americans, the financial well-being of families, and the stability of both local and national economies. We should all urge the Federal Reserve Board to thoroughly reassess the potential harm these regulations could inflict so that they do not push further economic recovery out of reach.
Related
Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission. If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, email your submission or idea to guestcommentary@bridgemi.com. Click here for details and submission guidelines.