Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Opinion | We can’t fix Lake Erie until we force farmers to stop polluting

This week at Adrian College in Lenawee County, the new head of Michigan’s agriculture and rural development agency took the stage for a keynote speech on Lake Erie pollution, which – very long story short – isn’t getting better.

Black and white woman headshot.
Carrie La Seur is the new legal director at For Love of Water (FLOW), a Traverse City-based nonprofit devoted to protecting the Great Lakes.

Director Tim Boring brags that Michigan spends $50 million a year on nutrient reduction, watershed management and farmland conservation projects in an attempt to improve water quality, but the 2022 algae bloom was worse than the 2008 baseline. 

These are not numbers that should make anyone feel good – except those on the receiving end of $50 million a year. It’s an admission that throwing money at this problem is never going to work.

“Phosphorus going to Lake Erie is kind of a thing,” Director Boring acknowledges. “We’re still applying fertilizers at rates in excess of fertilizer recommendations,” and “putting too much manure in too few places.” After decades of costly efforts to persuade the ag sector, ever so gently, to keep manure out of public waterways, Director Boring’s big shift in direction is this: “We’re going to have to provide substantial economic incentives to farmers to do things in different ways.” 

Wait a minute. If paying farmers to improve water quality works and Michigan has spent over half a billion dollars on it since 2010, what went wrong? 

The answer isn’t exactly a state secret. As Gov. Gretchen Whitmer told FLOW in 2020, “Agricultural commodity groups have been unwilling to work with my Administration to ensure that the state’s largest animal farms responsibly manage their manure, prevent winter runoff, and make sure pollutants are not overapplied on agricultural fields.” The result, after huge dumps of taxpayer money into the ag sector, is an unabated river of manure flowing into the Great Lakes.

Shelby Burlew, a program “verifier,” described the totally voluntary Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) (a bargain at $3M a year), which entices farmers into implementing water protection measures like buffer strips. You might wonder how Burlew verifies that this $3M expense results in water quality improvement. The short answer is, she doesn’t. That’s not her job. “Success and progress looks like farmer participation,” says Burlew. It’s getting farms from “yes I’m interested to all the way verified in the program.” There are exactly zero quantifiable metrics related to water quality, only gold-plated participation trophies.

If you want to know if the farmer next to you is taking any measures to keep field applied manure out of your local river and she doesn’t want to tell you, your only recourse is to go pound sand, pray, and of course, keep paying your taxes. Those fancy artificial wetlands don’t build themselves, and they only work until they’re choked with phosphorus.

It works like this. Farmers apply more manure and other fertilizer than the soil can absorb, to make absolutely sure that they’re getting the last fraction of a bushel possible in yields. Also because there’s a lot of manure to get rid of. A mountain of data tells us so. The fields are comprehensively plumbed with “drainage tiles,” a perforated pipe that carries away water to turn wetlands into farmland. New remote sensing research shows that 89 percent of pollutants flowing out of tile lines are carried by rain. 

It makes sense that spreading manure above drains would fill those drains with manure every time it rains, and that manure would run downhill toward bigger water. A child would understand. Yet we continue to talk about the need to educate farmers, as if they’re children. As if they can’t be held accountable.

Cities have to meet Safe Drinking Water Act standards and dispose of sewage sludge under strict regulation. Phosphorus removal by cities has achieved over half of Michigan’s responsibility for Lake Erie phosphorus reductions by 2025. According to Majid Khan, Great Lakes Water Authority Director of Wastewater Operations, phosphorus from upstream non-point sources is more than twice what greater Detroit receives in its sewage. End-of-pipe sources are 5-10 percent of phosphorus loading. The other 90 percent is flowing out of fields.

A transfer of wealth is happening. The median household income in Detroit, which gets hit with rate increases to process that river of manure, is $34,000. Net farm income on a Michigan dairy farm was $234,000 in 2019 – and that doesn’t touch the profitability of meat processors and the corporate end of the industry. 

Director Boring says all we need are a few tweaks here and there, but no real change to the model of shoveling money into farm country with no accountability. It turns out that farmers aren’t the ones being treated like naive children. It’s the rest of us chumps.

How impactful was this article for you?

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission. If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact David Zeman. Click here for details and submission guidelines.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now