Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Opinion | When did stealing from Michigan kids become an easier political decision than raising taxes

It was not an easy decision in 2010 to shift School Aid Fund money away from K-12 schools to fund community colleges. I know. I was there. And I voted for it, albeit reluctantly.

The School Aid Fund was first established in 1955 and in its 54-year history, it had never been used for anything but Michigan’s K-12 public schools. But desperate times called for desperate measures, and Gov. Jennifer Granholm posed the idea of a “loan” of $208.4 million from the School Aid Fund to fund community colleges in order to balance the 2010 state budget, which had been beaten down over the past decade by tax cuts and the Great Recession. A loan, not surprisingly, that was never paid back by future lawmakers.

I was serving my final year in the Senate, and I remember being in the caucus room as Gov. Granholm implored us to make that decision. I remember the discussions and hesitation amongst my colleagues on both sides of the aisle. And I remember us ultimately agreeing that it was and should only ever be a last resort, and that the decision was in the best interest of the state at the time.

It was an extremely difficult decision. And lawmakers are expected to make tough decisions. It’s what we run on. It’s what we’re elected for. And it’s what our constituents expect when we take office. It doesn’t take much gumption or conviction to vote for bills that have unanimous support in the Capitol and that are universally liked outside of it. It’s the tough votes that test our mettle.

It wasn’t an easy vote, and it was intended to be a temporary fix to a temporary problem. But sadly, for the past eight years, taking money away from the School Aid Fund and our K-12 kids has become an easy decision for today’s legislators, not a hard one. The exception unfortunately became the rule, and for the entirely wrong reason—freeing up General Fund dollars for massive tax cuts. Beginning with the 2010 state budget, lawmakers have diverted $4.5 billion from the School Aid Fund and K-12 schools, including $637 million in lost K-12 funding for the 2017-2018 school year and a record high of nearly $1 billion for the 2018-2019 school year.

Pilfering the School Aid Fund to fund community colleges and higher education has been done in every state budget of Gov. Rick Snyder’s tenure, with an increasing percentage of the total community college and higher education budgets coming from School Aid Fund dollars. Prior to the 2010 budget, the higher education and community college budgets were funded entirely from the General Fund. But three of the past five state budgets have funded community college operations entirely from the School Aid Fund, and the most recent budget more than doubles the School Aid dollars going to universities, accounting for a third of their funding.

And let’s be clear: This tactic has not been used to support Michigan’s kids or schools. In Gov. Snyder’s first budget for Budget Year 2012, the nearly $400 million taken from K-12 schools was accompanied by a $470 per-pupil cut in the K-12 foundation allowance—the only year since Proposal A in which the foundation allowance was statutorily cut. The cut was accompanied by a very large tax cut for businesses that cost $1.6 billion, with only part of that amount made up by increased taxes on individuals.

In 2012 and every budget year since, the School Aid shift has continued to only serve to increase General Fund dollars available for other uses, including tax cuts and credits that reduce revenue to the state like the aforementioned 2012 tax shift favoring businesses, repeal of the personal property tax, triggered income tax rate cuts down the road, the recent increase in the personal exemption and more. And lawmakers and candidates continue to talk about cutting the personal income tax.

Meanwhile, recent increases to the School Aid Fund and per-pupil spending have barely returned them to their 2011 funding levels. When accounting for inflation, the 2018 minimum allowance of $7,631 was equal to only $6,780 in 2011 dollars—a 7 percent drop in purchasing power and roughly $1,000 below where it should be. And this approach has not been a boon for universities and community colleges, whose annual funding has generally remained the same, with minimal increases primarily accounting for inflation.

Our K-12 schools and higher learning institutions depend on each other and competing for the same dollars hampers them both. Instead of prioritizing who gets funding, legislators should be funding all of the state’s top priorities, and that requires revenue and investment, not tax cuts.

It is time for lawmakers to make tough decisions again. Regardless of who sits in the governor’s office and Legislature next year, it is time to stand up for all Michigan kids and adequately fund K-12 schools AND our higher education institutions. And improve our roads, invest in public safety and support our communities, for that matter. Doing so will take two ideological shifts. One, legislators should again budget School Aid Fund dollars responsibly and return them to K-12 schools where they belong—while maintaining adequate higher ed funding through the General Fund. Two, state elected officials need to end their love affair with damaging tax cuts and instead RAISE new revenues and INVEST in our top priorities—especially K-12 schools.

How impactful was this article for you?

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission. If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact David Zeman. Click here for details and submission guidelines.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now