Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Prosecutor won't charge hunter in southern Michigan wolf kill

Man holding up up a dead wolf
A partially redacted photo shows the southern Michigan hunter involved in a January killing of an endangered wolf. (Photo courtesy of Michigan Department of Natural Resources)
  • A county prosecutor will not bring charges in the January killing of an endangered gray wolf in southern Michigan
  • The prosecutor called the killing an honest mistake by hunters who thought they were shooting a coyote
  • State investigators still don’t know how the animal reached southern Michigan

No one will face charges for the January killing of an endangered gray wolf in southern Michigan.

Calhoun County Prosecutor David Gilbert told Bridge Michigan he is declining to file charges after concluding that the hunter and guide involved in the killing honestly believed they had legally shot a coyote.

Hundreds of miles south of the animal’s known habitat, Gilbert said, it’s understandable that the hunters would not believe the animal they spotted while coyote hunting on January 19 to be a wolf.

“It’s like shooting a unicorn,” he said.

A DNR spokesperson confirmed the decision to Bridge Michigan, saying in a statement that Gilbert’s conclusion “was consistent with what the DNR found during its investigation into the matter.”

“Those involved appear to have reasonably believed they were shooting a coyote,” DNR spokesperson Ed Golder said. “The investigation revealed no information to indicate they should have expected there would be a wolf in the part of Michigan where they were hunting.”

Gilbert received the case in early June after a months-long investigation into the wolf’s death in Fredonia Township, an area south of Marshall and hundreds of miles south of the wolf’s home range.

A Marshall area man told investigators with the Department of Natural Resources that he shot the 84-pound male wolf after mistaking it for a coyote, an animal that rarely reaches 40 pounds.

Related: 

The man, a novice coyote hunter, had been heat-scoping for coyotes in a farm field with a much more experienced hunter, who coached him through the shot.

A taxidermist was also involved in the case, accepting the wolf’s carcass and then proceeding to mount it while state wildlife officials were in the midst of investigating.

The case sparked intrigue because wolves don’t live in southern Michigan, and to reach Calhoun County on its own, this one would have needed to either cross the Straits of Mackinac, which haven’t frozen over in either of the past two winters, or travel around lakes Michigan or Huron by land through some densely populated areas.

Public records secured by Bridge Michigan later revealed that the animal also had a trap wound on its front paw, indicating that it may have been relocated by humans.

Wolves are deeply politicized in Michigan and across the country, with some revering them and lobbying for their protection while others revile them and push for the government to legalize wolf hunting. Occasionally, Upper Peninsula lawmakers and other wolf-hunting supporters have suggested that some of the animals should be moved to the Lower Peninsula.

After investigating, state wildlife officials said they were unable to determine how the wolf got to southern Michigan or how it got the trap wound.

Wolves are an endangered species in the Great Lakes, which makes killing them a federal offense punishable by up to a year in prison and a $50,000 fine. The sole exception is for animals that pose a direct and immediate threat to human life.

But elected county prosecutors have broad discretion over whether to bring charges. 

In the weeks after DNR officials announced the killing, a group of Republican state lawmakers publicly urged officials not to punish the hunters. Wolf advocates, meanwhile, have pushed for the opposite.

On Friday, one expressed disappointment about Gilbert’s decision, noting that the Endangered Species Act makes no exception for mistakenly shooting a protected animal.

“The bottom line is, the first line of any hunter is, know your target,” said Nancy Warren, executive director of the National Wolfwatcher Coalition. “You don't shoot till you know your target.”

Rep. Jay DeBoyer, R-Clay Township, who wrote a letter in April urging officials not to punish the hunters, applauded the prosecutor’s decision and called upon the DNR to “address the predator issues” in Michigan.

Wolf rebound

Once numbering as high as 2 million across the U.S., wolves were exterminated from many states, including Michigan, by the mid-1900s. Now federally protected across 45 states, their numbers have climbed to about 6,000 in the contiguous U.S. and 7,000 to 11,000 in Alaska. Michigan’s population, according to the latest DNR estimate announced this week, is 762, all of them in the Upper Peninsula.

The investigation into the January wolf kill was complicated by a slow start and damaged evidence, after a DNR officer initially refused a request from within his agency to confiscate the animal’s carcass. By the time that decision was reversed, a taxidermist had already butchered the animal in preparation for mounting.

While the DNR is no longer actively investigating the case, it is still accepting additional information and has referred tipsters to the Report All Poaching hotline, (800) 292-7800.

Editor's note: This story was update at 4:50 p.m. on Friday, June 14, 2024, to add comments from the Calhoun County prosecutor.

​​​​​​

How impactful was this article for you?

Michigan Environment Watch

Michigan Environment Watch examines how public policy, industry, and other factors interact with the state’s trove of natural resources.

Michigan Environment Watch is made possible by generous financial support from:

Our generous Environment Watch underwriters encourage Bridge Michigan readers to also support civic journalism by becoming Bridge members. Please consider joining today.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now