Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Michigan judge upholds Jocelyn Benson’s absentee ballot application mailings

Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson
Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s office will allow Michigan residents to select gender-neutral designation on their driver license or state ID cards beginning next week. (Bridge file photo)

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson was within her rights to send absentee ballot applications to all of the state’s 7.7 million registered voters earlier this year, a Court of Claims judge ruled Wednesday. 

It’s a victory for Democatic Benson, who came under fire from President Donald Trump and other Republicans for the decision.

The court’s decision was expected after the same judge, Cynthia Stephens, denied a preliminary injunction request in June to stop Benson from mailing the applications in the first place.

Benson is required by law to provide information, instructions and supplies to help voters cast ballots, wrote Stephens, who is an appointee of former Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm.

“Defendant has clear and broad authority to provide advice and direction with respect to the conduct of elections and registrations,” Stephens wrote. “That is all she has done here: she has provided direction for conducting an election during an unprecedent[ed] global pandemic involving a highly contagious respiratory virus.”

Nevin Cooper-Keel, Yvonne Black and Robert Davis filed cases against Benson this year when she announced she planned to mail applications for an absentee ballot to all registered voters at a cost of about $4.5 million in federal funding.

They contended that legal precedent barred clerks from sending unsolicited applications because they could be construed as campaign “propaganda.” Stephens called that argument “unpersuasive.”

“The Court ruling affirms it is both within our authority and our obligation to ensure voters know their voting rights and how to exercise them this year,” Department of State spokesperson Tracy Wimmer wrote to Bridge via email. 

Davis told Bridge Wednesday he has already filed an emergency appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. 

"The Court of Claims opinion essentially rewrote Michigan election law, which is not acceptable under statutory construction. Judges are not legislators," Davis said. "I'm extremely confident that Judge Stephens' opinion will be reversed in short order."

Cooper-Keel said he’s not surprised about the decision because Stephens was appointed by a Democratic governor. 

“I have suspicions that there is judicial activism going on,” he said.

Benson argued in May the mailing was important to ensure voters are aware of their right to vote absentee for no reason, especially during a pandemic in which voting in person can pose a health risk. A 2018 initiative allowed all eligible voters to vote by mail. 

Republicans contended Benson would have been better off spending money to improve safety at polling places. Others contended it could increase voter fraud.

Trump called Benson a “rogue Secretary of State” on Twitter and threatened to withhold funding for Michigan, falsely claiming that she planned to send out ballots to Michigan voters. He later deleted the tweet and replaced it with a similar one citing “applications.” 

Benson responded that other secretaries of state, including GOP election officials in Iowa, Georgia, Nebraska and West Virginia had taken similar steps.

How impactful was this article for you?

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now