Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Coronavirus came to Michigan earlier than thought, records show

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer first learned the coronavirus had come to Michigan shortly after 8:49 p.m. March 10, with the confirmation of two cases in metro Detroit, internal emails show.

Since then, state officials have learned there already were likely 500 infections in Michigan at that time.

And nearly 10,000 people in Michigan were likely infected on March 24, when Whitmer issued her first stay-at-home order — more than five times the number of illnesses known at the time.

The difference: The estimates show the first day infected Michiganders experienced symptoms, rather than when tests confirmed they had the virus that has sickened some 50,000 state residents and killed nearly 5,000.

Michigan has posted the symptoms estimates on its coronavirus database since mid-April. 

And while the data do not contradict anything Whitmer or other government officials have said, they do offer an alternative way to visualize how and when the virus has spread throughout the state.

The symptoms data, for instance, show the virus was spreading well before the state’s infectious disease chief, Jim Collins, sent an email to state officials on March 10 announcing “Michigan has joined the ranks of all other great lakes states” with two positive tests in Oakland and Wayne counties. 

At least 13 people experienced symptoms as early as March 1, with nine of those in metro Detroit.

The data also show that new cases have dropped steadily since March 27, rather than April 3, when the state announced 1,953 positive tests.

Michigan receives the symptoms data after residents test positive and tell their physicians or test administrators when they first felt ill. That day is known as the “onset” date and is sent to state and local health officials, said Lynn Sutfin, a spokesperson for the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.

New look at virus

COVID-19 cases in Michigan have fallen more steadily, for a longer period of time, according to records showing when people actually felt symptoms of the illness rather than when they got a positive test.

 
 

In cases when someone without symptoms has a positive test, like a front-line health care worker, the “onset” date is the day of the test, Sutfin said.

The takeaways from the data: Michigan is further along in its coronavirus fight than previously believed and Whitmer’s stay-at-home order had an almost immediate impact in slowing the curve.

The daily number of residents with symptoms has fallen steadily since March 27, three days after Whitmer’s order. The number of reported positive tests for coronavirus, meanwhile, rose for eight days after Whitmer’s order into early April.

Those trends continue into May: The average case count of symptoms data on May 8 was about 230 cases a day, less than half of 560 cases a day looking solely at the date a positive test was reported. 

That indicates infections appear to be less widespread now. The records also would appear to confirm that, while cases are steadily declining statewide, there are stark differences between regions. 

Southeast Michigan has seen infections fall precipitously for weeks while they have just hit an apparent peak in west and southwest Michigan.

Virus arc differs widely by region

Metro Detroit was hammered by COVID-19 cases in March but infections have been in decline for weeks while west Michigan saw its first substantial rise in cases in late April.

 
 

How impactful was this article for you?

Michigan Health Watch

Michigan Health Watch is made possible by generous financial support from:

Please visit the About page for more information, and subscribe to Michigan Health Watch.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now