- The Michigan Court of Appeals says chimpanzees are not considered persons who deserve to have their imprisonment defended
- In a hearing last week, an animal rights group appealed to the court to make a UP zoo justify keeping seven chimpanzees
- The Nonhuman Rights Project intends to appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court
Chimpanzees in Michigan are not considered “persons” with human rights, according to the state’s Court of Appeals.
That means the owners of the DeYoung Family Zoo in the Upper Peninsula will not need to defend the confinement of seven chimpanzees.
The Oct. 17 decision by Judges Matthew Ackerman, Brock Swartzle and Chistopher Trebilcock came after a lawyer for the Nonhuman Rights Project argued on Oct. 14 that a court should decide whether chimpanzees are entitled to some of the same rights to liberty as humans.
In its decision, the court said chimpanzees are animals, which previous courts have said should be treated as property.
“No exception exists for ‘intelligent’ animals, which in any event has no natural stopping point,” the appellate court’s decision reads.
Related:
- Do Michigan chimps have right to liberty? Court to weigh question
- Legislators favor bear petting, despite zookeepers’ warnings
- Snyder vetoes looser rules on owning lions, tigers, bears
The Michigan Supreme Court would have to decide whether the state should treat certain animals as persons, the judges wrote.
The Nonhuman Rights Project intends to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The zoo could not be reached for comment.
Background
In 2023, the Nonhuman Rights Project filed a complaint in the 41st Circuit Court in Menominee County saying the chimpanzees at the DeYoung Family Zoo in Wallace should be considered autonomous beings — or persons — whose confinement must be justified by the zoo. They wanted to see the chimpanzees released to a sanctuary.
The rights group filed declarations from experts such as famed primatologist Jane Goodall, who was still alive at the time, saying chimpanzees are autonomous beings with complex cognitive abilities and social networks.
Circuit Judge Mary B. Bargland dismissed the complaint, saying chimpanzees aren’t human. The Nonhuman Rights Project appealed.
The hearing
Nonhuman Rights Project attorney Jake Davis was initially granted 15 minutes last week for the hearing before the Court of Appeals, but the judges ultimately engaged him for close to 25 minutes.
Swartzle questioned whether a being’s ability to act autonomously should be enough to guarantee its right to liberty. He said humans can conceivably be a part of the “social contract” in which they give up certain liberties in exchange for rights.
“If we had five, I don’t know, elephants or chimps in this courtroom, I don’t know that they’d all be sitting down as nicely as everyone else in this room,” he said.
Swartzle also asked where the court would draw the line if chimpanzees were considered persons.
“How extraordinary are you willing to go? Elephants, dolphins, chimpanzees, dogs, cats?” he asked.
Davis, the lawyer, suggested the question be answered on a case-by-case or species-by-species basis.
Davis expressed disappointment in the decision.
“Honestly, the decision … read to me like they did not consider anything said at oral argument,” Davis said. “Their position — taken to its logical conclusion — would mean children and the disabled cannot have legal rights.”
Davis said social contract theory, on which he felt the judges primarily based their decision, has “enabled white society to subjugate other humans.”
Sign up for our outdoors newsletter
Want more coverage like this delivered directly into your inbox? Sign up for the Bridge Michigan Outdoors newsletter here.
Thank you to our Bridge Michigan Outdoors sponsors
Bridge Michigan Outdoors is made possible by generous financial support from our sponsors. Please visit the About page for more information and to subscribe to Bridge Michigan Outdoors. Interested in becoming a sponsor? Contact Emma Carr.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under our Republication Guidelines. Questions? Email republishing@bridgemi.com
You must be logged in to post a comment.