Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

We need your vote!

During this important election year, Bridge readers like you know that high-quality journalism like ours is more critical than ever. There’s a lot on the line, and we’re working daily to deliver the information you need to prepare you for November’s election. Can we count on your vote of confidence in our newsroom? Donate today!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

$1B of Michigan’s welfare money went to college students who weren't poor

For more than a quarter century, policy makers have tinkered with Michigan’s social safety net. Whether reforms have improved the state’s welfare system remains a matter of ongoing debate.

Safety net and welfare reform issues are frequently in the spotlight – and likely to remain there in 2018 – for two reasons. Michigan has a large low-income population. And the social safety net costs taxpayers billions of dollars per year.  

Sixteen percent of Michigan households and 22 percent of Michigan children currently live in poverty. Another 25 percent of Michigan households live above the poverty line, and have jobs, but live paycheck to paycheck with no savings, according to the Michigan Association of United Ways.

Related: How more affluent families get welfare for pricey private colleges

Meantime, health care and other social safety net programs total more than $25 billion dollars in the state budget. That’s 45 percent of the overall state budget, including pass-through federal revenues.

Reform Debates Through the Years

In 1991, Gov. John Engler signed a law ending general assistance, cutting off welfare payments of about $144 a month to 80,000 able-bodied adults without children.  Critics said it would harm vulnerable recipients, while officials said the state could no longer could afford the program.

Fewer Families on Cash Assistance

Average monthly caseloads on state cash assistance by fiscal year.

2007: 85,389

2008: 72,568

2009: 70,540

2010: 79,233

2011: 79,660

2012: 58,641

2013: 49,165

2014: 38,387

Then, in 1996, Congress approved sweeping reform that converted federal welfare aid to states to block grants – giving them wide discretion on how to spend the funds. Backers said this would allow states to more nimbly help recipients off welfare and into work.

Welfare for Middle Class College Students

On average, half of all U.S. welfare money controlled by states goes to programs aimed at getting recipients back to work. They include cash assistance, child-care and work-related initiatives. In Michigan, it’s less than 25 percent - one of the lowest rates in the country.

Under federal welfare reform, state welfare spending must meet one of four goals: Helping needy families, getting recipients into jobs, reducing out-of-wedlock pregnancies and encouraging two-parent families.

Related health and welfare coverage from our 2018 Michigan Issue Guide

Since 2007, Michigan has spent more than a billion dollars from the welfare program on college scholarships, with some funds going to middle- and upper-income students attending private Michigan colleges. That includes students from families earning more than $100,000 a year.

Advocates for the poor argue those funds could be better used to help the truly needy. State officials maintain that students who attend college are less likely to have children out of wedlock.

New Limits on Cash Assistance

On paper, welfare spending in Michigan has remained level. But the number of Michigan families getting cash assistance fell by half from 2007 to 2013, even as tens of thousands of families still struggled with poverty and unemployment coming out of the Great Recession.

Concerned that some on welfare were abusing the system, state lawmakers in 2011 approved a measure to limit recipients to four years of cash assistance. Those who were on welfare for more than four years dating back to 2007 were kicked off the program.

Twelve months later, the state was spending $18 million less a month on cash assistance, likely the result of both welfare reform and an improving economy. While reform advocates said stiffer time limits would force recipients to find work, it is unclear how many found jobs since the state does not track recipients after they leave the system.

Drug Tests Come Up Negative

In 2013, legislators responded to allegations recipients were abusing cash benefits when they banned use of Bridge Cards at ATMs in casinos and strip clubs. Low-income residents can use cards to buy food and other items at the store. The measure was approved following revelations welfare recipients used benefits to get nearly $90,000 from a Detroit casino.

The following year Gov. Rick Snyder signed a law to create a one-year pilot program to screen some welfare recipients and test those suspected of drug use. In a 2016 report to legislators, the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services said the pilot program did not catch any recipients using illegal drugs.

Massive Computer Error

Michigan’s unemployment insurance fund is another piece of the safety net, giving workers a financial cushion when they lose jobs.

But a state calculation that it could streamline claims processing by turning fraud determinations over to a computer backfired, resulting in thousands of false findings of fraud.

In August, the state agreed to refund nearly $21 million to residents after reviewing cases in which the Unemployment Insurance Agency falsely accused tens of thousands of people of benefit fraud. The state found that more than 44,000 cases out of 62,784 with fraud findings did not involve fraud.

The UIA said it is committed to improve its system through enhanced training, policy changes and changes to the computer system.

KEEP DIGGING: MORE INFORMATION ON MICHIGAN’S SAFETY NET

Explore the Facts & Issues Guide:

At A Glance

Slideshows…

Education & Talent

Economy & Prosperity

Quality of Life

Government & Reform

Who We Are & The Facts on Our Facts

How impactful was this article for you?

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now