News and analysis from The Center for Michigan •
©2015 Bridge Michigan. All Rights Reserved. • Join us online at

Original article URL:

Talent & education

Michigan’s forgotten 4-year-olds:

Preschool’s great, if you can get there

Every morning, a bus picked up 5-year-old kindergartners a block from the Middleton family home in Walker and took them to a Kenowa Hills school. Every morning, Kelly Middleton packed up 4-year-old Seamus and drove him to the very same school.

“I’ve seen buses go by,” Middleton said. “When it’s winter and you don’t want to drag your (younger) children out, it would have been nice to have that option.”

In many Michigan communities, free preschool comes with a price. Families must transport their 4-year-olds to and from school, even when buses going to the same school go through their neighborhoods.

Almost 30,000 Michigan 4-year-olds who are eligible for state-funded pre-K are not in classrooms, lowering their odds of earning a diploma and putting a drag on the state’s economy. One of the leading reasons more children aren’t in the program, say early childhood advocates, is lack of transportation.

“There were families who didn’t have cars and transportation was a huge issue,” Middleton said. A lot of parents are working … and there were parents who were in school themselves and had to work out a way to get their children (to and from class).”

Some never work it out.

It’s a matter of numbers

Michigan offers free, half-day preschool for 4-year-olds with household incomes under 300 percent of the federal poverty line ($69,150 for a family of four). See if you qualify . A recent study following children enrolled in the Great Start Readiness Program found they do better on standardized tests, are held back in grades less, and graduate from high school at a higher rate than similar children not exposed to quality preschool. As adults, they are more likely to hold jobs and earn more in those jobs than their non-GSRP peers.

But many lower-income families who qualify for GSRP don’t have vehicles, or the parents’ work schedules don’t allow them to transport kids to and from school. “As a (working) parent, very clearly, I’ve created a dynamic where I’m probably going to have a baby-sitter and pay them rather than going to this (free) public program,” said Don Wotruba, deputy director of the Michigan Association of School Boards.

Former GSRP teacher Natalie Merryman heard frustrations about transportation all the time from already-stressed low-income families.

“One of the parents’ preliminary questions is ‘What is the busing?’” Merryman said. “And I have to say, ‘There is no busing.’

“The whole purpose of the program is to get these little guys here and educate them,” Merryman added. “To our building, we had multiple buses, but no buses for GSRP.”

Transportation = money

Fewer and fewer school districts provide busing for GSRP because of the cost. State funding for the program doesn’t cover the full costs of all classroom expenses, let alone busing.

“The GSRP money only goes so far,” said a frustrated Dave Campbell, superintendent of Livingston County Intermediate School District. Even paying GSRP teachers just $23,000 a year, “we just break even. The $3,400 per student GSRP allotment simply doesn’t provide enough to cover buses, too.”

And separate bus routes for GSRP students, who often attend classes for just a half day, can be cost prohibitive, explained Mary Bailey, early childhood director for Calhoun County intermediate School District.

“We were spending $50,000 to $60,000 a year,” Bailey said. “We were literally running across two counties, picking up 18 kids. We decided to buy more teachers and save the money we were spending on transportation.”

The result of those tough budget decisions can be seen in St. Clair County, according to officials at the county’s regional educational serviced agency. Port Huron Area Schools doesn’t provide transportation and can’t fill its preschool slots; Algonac Community schools offers busing, and “they’re getting so many applications, they increased their (GSRP) slots from 36 to 48 in one year,” said Dan DeGrow, superintendent of St. Clair RESA. “I offered districts $100 (per student) for transportation, but $100 a year doesn’t cover it.”

Struggling to link up

Schools could allow GSRP students to ride normal K-12 buses, if the GSRP classes are held in the same building. Several districts in Calhoun County do that now, Bailey said, including a half-day child care service to fill out the day before the 4-year-olds go home on the same buses.

Schools could share transportation costs with Head Start, which provides busing for its 4-year-old preschool students (children in homes under 100 percent of the federal poverty line are usually in Head Start). Many communities around the country coordinate transportation between federal and state preschool programs, according to a national pre-K –policy expert, who seemed puzzled by Michigan’s inability to figure it out.

That sort of creative thinking could help, but when many schools are losing money with every preschooler who walks in their doors, there’s not much incentive to think creatively.

Transportation logistics and the $3,400 per student allotment for GSRP students are the reasons districts aren’t “out there beating the bushes” for more kids, said Livingston County’s Campbell.

Graduating to the bus

There is a spot on the bus this year for Seamus Middleton. The 5-year-old walks with his mother one block to the bus stop, which takes him to the same school his mother had to drive him to last year.

Mother Kelly Middleton has a 17-month-old daughter, too. “I’m hoping the program is still going on when she’s ready to attend preschool,” she said.

Senior Writer Ron French joined Bridge in 2011 after having won more than 40 national and state journalism awards since he joined the Detroit News in 1995. French has a long track record of uncovering emerging issues and changing the public policy debate through his work. In 2006, he foretold the coming crisis in the auto industry in a special report detailing how worker health-care costs threatened to bankrupt General Motors.

1 comment from a Bridge reader.Add mine!

  1. mary wallace

    While I understand the need for free preschool, there are a number of DHS eligible children who could attend quality preschool outside of Head Start and GSRP if the families only knew of the service. While there is a charge, for DHS recipients it is small. At our center the charge is 50 cents per hour, for a program that has a highly qualified staff and uses a research based curriculum.

    With the quality rating system now in place in our state, there is less and less reason that children are going without a preschool program that would help prepare them for kindergarden and beyond. Instead of the state funding additional GSRP classrooms, a better use of limited resources would be a program that helps nonprofit preschools with scholarship monies for children from families that do not have the financvial resources for preschool. Many quality nonprofit preschools have openings for children now without waiting for more classrooms to be developed in the future.

Leave your comment...

Your email address will not be published.

Currently on Bridge

Will we be better off if Proposal 1 passes? Former treasurer says yes

An Earth Day pitch: When you hang up the phone for good, toss it the right way

Michigan’s roads affect everyone, so a 'yes' vote on Proposal 1 makes sense

‘Diplomacy Begins Here’ conference aims to illuminate international relations

What NOT to post on Facebook: Jokes about prison rape, when you’re in charge of preventing prison rape

A program to give young offenders a second chance is sending many to prison

Similar accounts in suit over alleged teen prison rapes pose challenge to state's defense

‘New fish’ ‒ One teen inmate’s account of alleged sexual assault

Early learning summit in June could impact Michigan’s children

Money Smart Week: Be penny wise, and pound savvier

Plan B or no Plan B, here’s what happens if road proposal fails

The political tale behind the selling of Proposal 1

A Bridge primer: Untangling the pothole promise of Proposal 1

Who supports, and opposes, Proposal 1

Let's rebuild Michigan through its greatest asset: its water

Could a public boarding school model work in Detroit?

Coalition supporting Detroit schools a step in the city’s road back

Chasing fads? Today’s schools are struggling too much for that

For one Michigan legislative staffer, an hour or two in the spotlight

A cull is a kill, and it’s an overreaction to deer ‘problem’

Lack of college guidance keeps poor and rural students from applying

Those who can, do – and get their hands ‘dirty’ in the process

For one Detroit mom, a complicated path to employment

Detroit by the numbers – the truth about poverty

Michigan should require dental screening for all children entering kindergarten

Where in the world is the Center for Michigan?

After two years, hard to call ACA anything but a success

Bridge’s Academic State Champs emphasizes all the wrong measurements

A graying population poses challenges for Up North counties

Up North, isolation impedes health care for seniors

Enbridge oil pipes and the Straits of Mackinac: Too risky to ignore

Not bigger government, but better services when Community Health and Human Services merge

Two Michigans gaze across a widening gap

In northern counties, workers and business find each other lacking

Hidden poverty stalks a Pure Michigan setting

Postcard: How a git-’er-done spirit helps one rural school district

Postcard: When elk is for dinner

Postcard: Luxe life at Bay Harbor reflects changing economy

Postcard: A roof and a bed

Invest in non-partisan journalism.

Donate to The Center for Michigan. Find out why.