Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues
See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:
- “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
- “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
- “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.
If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!
Opinion | Michigan can’t afford a blanket moratorium on data centers
Share this:
I once worked for a politician who privately joked, “If you see an angry mob, jump out front and pretend it’s a parade.”
It was a crude line, but it revealed something about the nature of politics: when large groups of voters are mad, politicians see opportunity. That situation is playing itself out in the debate over data centers in Michigan.
Local residents have every right to ask difficult questions before large data centers are sited in their communities: Will a project affect the reliability of the energy grid? What will it mean for the local water supply? Will the project fit the long-term interests of the community?
This is essential information.
A one-year moratorium on data centers has become the new rallying cry in a politics that rewards outrage over serious policy work. Rather than hosting study sessions or gathering research, politicians are sponsoring public rallies, holding press conferences, and airing TV commercials. The efforts seem more about electioneering than fact-finding.
Unfortunately, some local discussions have been short-circuited by quick zoning approvals before residents had a meaningful chance to ask questions. In other cases, deep-pocketed corporate interests have threatened lawsuits, leaving local officials little choice but to approve projects local residents oppose.
But the answer to a bad process is to improve the process. The answer is not a one-year statewide moratorium that treats every proposed data center the same. Unfortunately, nuance doesn’t resonate well in politics.
Michigan’s current debate is not just about whether a data center gets built. It is about what signal our state sends to any technology company looking for a new home.
The message of a blanket moratorium is not, “We are thoughtful.” The message is, “We panic.” A state that wants next-generation investment cannot behave like it is suspicious of it.
Two respected research groups have recently completed comprehensive studies on the issue: Public Sector Consultants and the Citizens Research Council of Michigan. Public Sector Consultants found that Michigan already has between 50 and 80 operational data centers, the vast majority of them small facilities very different from the hyperscale projects now drawing public attention. The CRC’s nearly 100-page report found that many smaller data centers are nearly indistinguishable from ordinary office buildings. It also found that some concerns, especially local power reliability, are often overstated. The clear conclusion: proposed projects should be reviewed thoroughly on a case-by-case basis.
In the global AI arms race where speed is the difference between leading and losing — a statewide year-long moratorium will likely function as a permanent prohibition. No matter how small the project or how limited its impact, Michigan’s answer is still, “Maybe next year.”
This fits a familiar pattern in Michigan policymaking: stoking fear and cynicism while chasing away jobs and opportunity. Since 2000, Michigan has fallen from 18th to 40th in per-capita income and we rank 43rd in unemployment. Our kids are leaving Michigan for better opportunities elsewhere.
It’s hard not to notice that much of the public opposition to data centers is being driven by those already comfortably employed and insulated from the consequences of rejecting next generation jobs. Many entry-level and administrative roles are being eliminated by artificial intelligence. Young workers have had the first rung of the economic ladder stripped from them. They need career opportunities too.
Data center construction is one of the few clear economic benefits attached to the same technological wave. Data center construction has the potential to employ thousands of blue-collar Gen Z workers — many of them local apprentices.
Our state should not blindly approve every data center. Local residents should receive clear answers on energy, water, noise and other concerns. Project owners should work to earn public trust, not bulldoze their way through local opposition. Local governments need stronger tools and clear statewide standards.
But Michigan should not let political opportunism turn legitimate questions into blanket statewide rejection. At some point, “we need more answers” becomes indistinguishable from “we will keep asking questions until the project dies.” The solution is clear standards, serious review, enforceable protections and a bias toward growth when concerns can be mitigated. Michigan should also insist on homegrown talent building these projects over out-of-state traveling workers.
A moratorium on data centers may make for an easy election year rallying cry, but Michigan can ill afford to reflexively reject yet another economic opportunity that quietly disappears to other states.
Related
Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission. If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, email your submission or idea to guestcommentary@bridgemi.com. Click here for details and submission guidelines.